Message ID | 20200613024706.27975-5-alim.akhtar@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI | expand |
Hi Alim, On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Some UFS host controllers like Exynos uses granularities of PRDT length and > offset as bytes, whereas others uses actual segment count. > > Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com> > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index ee30ed6cc805..ba093d0d0942 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -2151,8 +2151,14 @@ static int ufshcd_map_sg(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) > return sg_segments; > > if (sg_segments) { > - lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > - cpu_to_le16((u16)sg_segments); > + > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) > + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > + cpu_to_le16((sg_segments * > + sizeof(struct ufshcd_sg_entry))); > + else > + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > + cpu_to_le16((u16) (sg_segments)); > > prd_table = (struct ufshcd_sg_entry *)lrbp->ucd_prdt_ptr; > > @@ -3500,11 +3506,21 @@ static void ufshcd_host_memory_configure(struct ufs_hba *hba) > cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(cmd_desc_element_addr)); > > /* Response upiu and prdt offset should be in double words */ > - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > - cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); > - utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); > - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > - cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) { > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > + cpu_to_le16(response_offset); > + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = > + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset); > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE); > + } else { > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > + cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); > + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = > + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); > + } > > ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, &hba->lrb[i], i); > } Isn't this patch missing an update to ufshcd_print_trs()? It uses ->prd_table_length as the number of segments, not the number of bytes. - Eric
Hi Eric, > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> > Sent: 12 August 2020 05:59 > To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Cc: robh@kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; > krzk@kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; > kwmad.kim@samsung.com; stanley.chu@mediatek.com; > cang@codeaurora.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kishon@ti.com > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v10 04/10] scsi: ufs: introduce > UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN quirk > > Hi Alim, > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > Some UFS host controllers like Exynos uses granularities of PRDT > > length and offset as bytes, whereas others uses actual segment count. > > > > Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > index ee30ed6cc805..ba093d0d0942 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > @@ -2151,8 +2151,14 @@ static int ufshcd_map_sg(struct ufs_hba *hba, > struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) > > return sg_segments; > > > > if (sg_segments) { > > - lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > > - cpu_to_le16((u16)sg_segments); > > + > > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) > > + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > > + cpu_to_le16((sg_segments * > > + sizeof(struct ufshcd_sg_entry))); > > + else > > + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > > + cpu_to_le16((u16) (sg_segments)); > > > > prd_table = (struct ufshcd_sg_entry *)lrbp->ucd_prdt_ptr; > > > > @@ -3500,11 +3506,21 @@ static void > ufshcd_host_memory_configure(struct ufs_hba *hba) > > > cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(cmd_desc_element_addr)); > > > > /* Response upiu and prdt offset should be in double words */ > > - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > > - cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); > > - utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); > > - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > > - cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); > > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) { > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > > + cpu_to_le16(response_offset); > > + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = > > + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset); > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > > + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE); > > + } else { > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > > + cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); > > + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = > > + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > > + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); > > + } > > > > ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, &hba->lrb[i], i); > > } > > Isn't this patch missing an update to ufshcd_print_trs()? It uses > ->prd_table_length as the number of segments, not the number of bytes. > prd_table_length will be populated before it reaches ufshcd_print_trs() based on UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN. > - Eric
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 06:51:13AM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> > > Sent: 12 August 2020 05:59 > > To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > Cc: robh@kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; > > krzk@kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; > > kwmad.kim@samsung.com; stanley.chu@mediatek.com; > > cang@codeaurora.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kishon@ti.com > > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v10 04/10] scsi: ufs: introduce > > UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN quirk > > > > Hi Alim, > > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:17:00AM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > > Some UFS host controllers like Exynos uses granularities of PRDT > > > length and offset as bytes, whereas others uses actual segment count. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 ++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > > index ee30ed6cc805..ba093d0d0942 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > > @@ -2151,8 +2151,14 @@ static int ufshcd_map_sg(struct ufs_hba *hba, > > struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) > > > return sg_segments; > > > > > > if (sg_segments) { > > > - lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > > > - cpu_to_le16((u16)sg_segments); > > > + > > > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) > > > + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > > > + cpu_to_le16((sg_segments * > > > + sizeof(struct ufshcd_sg_entry))); > > > + else > > > + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = > > > + cpu_to_le16((u16) (sg_segments)); > > > > > > prd_table = (struct ufshcd_sg_entry *)lrbp->ucd_prdt_ptr; > > > > > > @@ -3500,11 +3506,21 @@ static void > > ufshcd_host_memory_configure(struct ufs_hba *hba) > > > > > cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(cmd_desc_element_addr)); > > > > > > /* Response upiu and prdt offset should be in double words > */ > > > - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > > > - cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); > > > - utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); > > > - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > > > - cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); > > > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) { > > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > > > + cpu_to_le16(response_offset); > > > + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = > > > + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset); > > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > > > + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE); > > > + } else { > > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = > > > + cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); > > > + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = > > > + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); > > > + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = > > > + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); > > > + } > > > > > > ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, &hba->lrb[i], i); > > > } > > > > Isn't this patch missing an update to ufshcd_print_trs()? It uses > > ->prd_table_length as the number of segments, not the number of bytes. > > > prd_table_length will be populated before it reaches ufshcd_print_trs() > based on UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN. > Yes, which is why it seems ufshcd_print_trs() needs to be updated to take UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN into account. - Eric
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index ee30ed6cc805..ba093d0d0942 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -2151,8 +2151,14 @@ static int ufshcd_map_sg(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) return sg_segments; if (sg_segments) { - lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = - cpu_to_le16((u16)sg_segments); + + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = + cpu_to_le16((sg_segments * + sizeof(struct ufshcd_sg_entry))); + else + lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr->prd_table_length = + cpu_to_le16((u16) (sg_segments)); prd_table = (struct ufshcd_sg_entry *)lrbp->ucd_prdt_ptr; @@ -3500,11 +3506,21 @@ static void ufshcd_host_memory_configure(struct ufs_hba *hba) cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(cmd_desc_element_addr)); /* Response upiu and prdt offset should be in double words */ - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = - cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); - utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); - utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = - cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN) { + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = + cpu_to_le16(response_offset); + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset); + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE); + } else { + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_offset = + cpu_to_le16(response_offset >> 2); + utrdlp[i].prd_table_offset = + cpu_to_le16(prdt_offset >> 2); + utrdlp[i].response_upiu_length = + cpu_to_le16(ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE >> 2); + } ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, &hba->lrb[i], i); } diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h index f8d08cb9caf7..a9b9ace9fc72 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h @@ -535,6 +535,12 @@ enum ufshcd_quirks { * enabled via HCE register. */ UFSHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_HCE = 1 << 8, + + /* + * This quirk needs to be enabled if the host controller regards + * resolution of the values of PRDTO and PRDTL in UTRD as byte. + */ + UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN = 1 << 9, }; enum ufshcd_caps {