| Message ID | 20200528011658.71590-1-alim.akhtar@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Sent: 28 May 2020 06:47 > To: robh@kernel.org > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; krzk@kernel.org; > avri.altman@wdc.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; > kwmad.kim@samsung.com; stanley.chu@mediatek.com; > cang@codeaurora.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Alim Akhtar > <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Subject: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI > > This patch-set introduces UFS (Universal Flash Storage) host controller support > for Samsung family SoC. Mostly, it consists of UFS PHY and host specific driver. > . . . > Alim Akhtar (9): > scsi: ufs: add quirk to fix mishandling utrlclr/utmrlclr > scsi: ufs: add quirk to disallow reset of interrupt aggregation > scsi: ufs: add quirk to enable host controller without hce > scsi: ufs: introduce UFSHCD_QUIRK_PRDT_BYTE_GRAN quirk > dt-bindings: phy: Document Samsung UFS PHY bindings > phy: samsung-ufs: add UFS PHY driver for samsung SoC > dt-bindings: ufs: Add bindings for Samsung ufs host > scsi: ufs-exynos: add UFS host support for Exynos SoCs > arm64: dts: Add node for ufs exynos7 > > Kiwoong Kim (1): > scsi: ufs: add quirk to fix abnormal ocs fatal error > > .../bindings/phy/samsung,ufs-phy.yaml | 75 + > .../bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos-ufs.yaml | 89 ++ > .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts | 4 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 43 +- > drivers/phy/samsung/Kconfig | 9 + > drivers/phy/samsung/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos7-ufs.h | 86 ++ > drivers/phy/samsung/phy-samsung-ufs.c | 380 +++++ > drivers/phy/samsung/phy-samsung-ufs.h | 143 ++ > drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig | 12 + > drivers/scsi/ufs/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 1292 +++++++++++++++++ > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.h | 287 ++++ > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 126 +- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 29 + > drivers/scsi/ufs/unipro.h | 33 + > 16 files changed, 2596 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,ufs- > phy.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/samsung,exynos- > ufs.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos7-ufs.h > create mode 100644 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-samsung-ufs.c > create mode 100644 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-samsung-ufs.h > create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c > create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.h > Hi Martin and Kishon, Can you please take the patches into your respective trees? Thanks, > > base-commit: 0e698dfa282211e414076f9dc7e83c1c288314fd > -- > 2.17.1
On Thu, 28 May 2020 06:46:48 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > This patch-set introduces UFS (Universal Flash Storage) host > controller support for Samsung family SoC. Mostly, it consists of > UFS PHY and host specific driver. > [...] Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show up in my public tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. Thanks!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > Sent: 03 June 2020 08:02 > To: robh@kernel.org; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; krzk@kernel.org; linux- > samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; > stanley.chu@mediatek.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; cang@codeaurora.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > kwmad.kim@samsung.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI > > On Thu, 28 May 2020 06:46:48 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > > This patch-set introduces UFS (Universal Flash Storage) host > > controller support for Samsung family SoC. Mostly, it consists of UFS > > PHY and host specific driver. > > [...] > > Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show up in my public > tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. > Thanks Martin, Hi Rob and Kishon/Vinod Can you please pickup dt-bindings and PHY driver respectively? > Thanks! > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Hi Alim, On 6/8/2020 8:15 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> >> Sent: 03 June 2020 08:02 >> To: robh@kernel.org; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> >> Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; krzk@kernel.org; > linux- >> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; >> stanley.chu@mediatek.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- >> kernel@lists.infradead.org; cang@codeaurora.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; >> kwmad.kim@samsung.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI >> >> On Thu, 28 May 2020 06:46:48 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> >>> This patch-set introduces UFS (Universal Flash Storage) host >>> controller support for Samsung family SoC. Mostly, it consists of UFS >>> PHY and host specific driver. >>> [...] >> >> Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show up in my > public >> tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. >> > Thanks Martin, > Hi Rob and Kishon/Vinod > Can you please pickup dt-bindings and PHY driver respectively? You might have CC'ed me only for the PHY patch. I don't have the dt-bindings in my inbox. Care to re-send what's missing again? This will be merged after -rc1 is tagged. Thanks Kishon > >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering >
Hi Kishon > -----Original Message----- > From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > Sent: 08 June 2020 08:23 > To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; 'Martin K. Petersen' > <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; robh@kernel.org > Cc: krzk@kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; > avri.altman@wdc.com; stanley.chu@mediatek.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; cang@codeaurora.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; kwmad.kim@samsung.com; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Vinod Koul' <vkoul@kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI > > Hi Alim, > > On 6/8/2020 8:15 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > >> Sent: 03 June 2020 08:02 > >> To: robh@kernel.org; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > >> Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; > >> krzk@kernel.org; > > linux- > >> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; > >> stanley.chu@mediatek.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > >> kernel@lists.infradead.org; cang@codeaurora.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > >> kwmad.kim@samsung.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI > >> > >> On Thu, 28 May 2020 06:46:48 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > >> > >>> This patch-set introduces UFS (Universal Flash Storage) host > >>> controller support for Samsung family SoC. Mostly, it consists of > >>> UFS PHY and host specific driver. > >>> [...] > >> > >> Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show up in > >> my > > public > >> tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. > >> > > Thanks Martin, > > Hi Rob and Kishon/Vinod > > Can you please pickup dt-bindings and PHY driver respectively? > > You might have CC'ed me only for the PHY patch. I don't have the dt-bindings in > my inbox. Care to re-send what's missing again? This will be merged after -rc1 is > tagged. > Sure, will re-send this series. > Thanks > Kishon > > > > >> Thanks! > >> > >> -- > >> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering > >
Hi Kishon, > -----Original Message----- > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Sent: 11 June 2020 20:49 > To: 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>; 'Martin K. Petersen' > > >> > > >> Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show up > > >> in my > > > public > > >> tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. > > >> > > > Thanks Martin, > > > Hi Rob and Kishon/Vinod > > > Can you please pickup dt-bindings and PHY driver respectively? > > > > You might have CC'ed me only for the PHY patch. I don't have the > > dt-bindings in my inbox. Care to re-send what's missing again? This > > will be merged after -rc1 is tagged. > > -rc1 is out, I do not see phy driver patch in your tree[1] yet, let me know if I am looking into right tree. [1] -> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git Thanks! > Sure, will re-send this series. > > > Thanks > > Kishon
On 20-06-20, 07:29, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > Sent: 11 June 2020 20:49 > > To: 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>; 'Martin K. Petersen' > > > >> > > > >> Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show up > > > >> in my > > > > public > > > >> tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. > > > >> > > > > Thanks Martin, > > > > Hi Rob and Kishon/Vinod > > > > Can you please pickup dt-bindings and PHY driver respectively? > > > > > > You might have CC'ed me only for the PHY patch. I don't have the > > > dt-bindings in my inbox. Care to re-send what's missing again? This > > > will be merged after -rc1 is tagged. > > > > > -rc1 is out, I do not see phy driver patch in your tree[1] yet, let me know if I am looking into right tree. > [1] -> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git Right tree > > Thanks! > > > Sure, will re-send this series. But patches have not been sent right, pls send and me/Kishon will review Thanks
Hi Vinod > -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > Sent: 24 June 2020 15:51 > To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Cc: 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>; robh@kernel.org; > krzk@kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; > stanley.chu@mediatek.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; cang@codeaurora.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > kwmad.kim@samsung.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Martin K. Petersen' > <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI > > On 20-06-20, 07:29, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > Hi Kishon, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > > Sent: 11 June 2020 20:49 > > > To: 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>; 'Martin K. Petersen' > > > > >> > > > > >> Applied [1,2,3,4,5,9] to 5.9/scsi-queue. The series won't show > > > > >> up in my > > > > > public > > > > >> tree until shortly after -rc1 is released. > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks Martin, > > > > > Hi Rob and Kishon/Vinod > > > > > Can you please pickup dt-bindings and PHY driver respectively? > > > > > > > > You might have CC'ed me only for the PHY patch. I don't have the > > > > dt-bindings in my inbox. Care to re-send what's missing again? > > > > This will be merged after -rc1 is tagged. > > > > > > > > -rc1 is out, I do not see phy driver patch in your tree[1] yet, let me know if I am > looking into right tree. > > [1] -> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git > > Right tree > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Sure, will re-send this series. > > But patches have not been sent right, pls send and me/Kishon will review > Thanks for your kind attention on this series. As per [0] comment from Kishon, patch 7/10 [1] and probably 6/10 [2] should have been Applied after 5.8-rc1 was tagged. I have already send and re-send V10 of this series. Kishon has already reviewed and provided comments and I have addressed them as well. These patches already have and Reviewed-by, Tested-by tags. Let me know if something more needs to be done from my side. [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/7/410 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/1705 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/1701 Thanks! > Thanks > -- > ~Vinod
Hi Alim, On 24-06-20, 22:27, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > > > Sure, will re-send this series. > > > > But patches have not been sent right, pls send and me/Kishon will review > > > Thanks for your kind attention on this series. As per [0] comment from > Kishon, patch 7/10 [1] and probably 6/10 [2] should have been Applied after > 5.8-rc1 was tagged. And that is something I am trying atm, but I dont have patches in my mailbox, so would you be kind enough to resend me these patches after rebasing to phy-next, also do add acks/reviews collected in previous posts. I dont think I have seen resend, or maybe I wasnt cced > I have already send and re-send V10 of this series. Kishon has already > reviewed and provided comments and I have addressed them as well. These > patches already have and Reviewed-by, Tested-by tags. > Let me know if something more needs to be done from my side. > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/7/410 > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/1705 > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/1701
Hi Vinod, > -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> > Sent: 24 June 2020 23:00 > To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Cc: 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>; robh@kernel.org; > krzk@kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; avri.altman@wdc.com; > stanley.chu@mediatek.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; cang@codeaurora.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > kwmad.kim@samsung.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Martin K. Petersen' > <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] exynos-ufs: Add support for UFS HCI > > Hi Alim, > > On 24-06-20, 22:27, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > > > > Sure, will re-send this series. > > > > > > But patches have not been sent right, pls send and me/Kishon will > > > review > > > > > Thanks for your kind attention on this series. As per [0] comment from > > Kishon, patch 7/10 [1] and probably 6/10 [2] should have been Applied > > after > > 5.8-rc1 was tagged. > > And that is something I am trying atm, but I dont have patches in my mailbox, so > would you be kind enough to resend me these patches after rebasing to phy- > next, also do add acks/reviews collected in previous posts. > > I dont think I have seen resend, or maybe I wasnt cced > Just noticed you were not CCed. I have sent those two patches. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11624571/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11624569/ PTAL, Thanks, > > -- > ~Vinod