Message ID | cover.1588956679.git.bblock@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | zfcp: fix DIF/DIX support with scsi-mq host-wide tag-set | expand |
On Fri, 8 May 2020 19:23:27 +0200, Benjamin Block wrote: > some time ago we noticed - Fedor did - that our DIV and DIX support in > zfcp broke at some point. I tracked that down to a commit made for v5.4 > (737eb78e82d5), but we didn't notice it back than, because our CI > doesn't currently run with either DIV, nor DIX enabled (time allowing > this is something we want to improve so we catch stuff like this > earlier). It also turned out that the commit in v5.4 was not really the > root-cause, and was only making the problem visible more easy. > > [...] Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks! [1/8] scsi: zfcp: Move shost modification after QDIO (re-)open into fenced function https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/978857c7e367 [2/8] scsi: zfcp: Move shost updates during xconfig data handling into fenced function https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/bd1684817d7d [3/8] scsi: zfcp: Move fc_host updates during xport data handling into fenced function https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/52e61fde5ec9 [4/8] scsi: zfcp: Fence fc_host updates during link-down handling https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/990486f3a850 [5/8] scsi: zfcp: Move p-t-p port allocation to after xport data https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/ac007adc4d2d [6/8] scsi: zfcp: Fence adapter status propagation for common statuses https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/971f2abb4ca4 [7/8] scsi: zfcp: Fence early sysfs interfaces for accesses of shost objects https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/71159b6ecb06 [8/8] scsi: zfcp: Move allocation of the shost object to after xconf- and xport-data https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/d0dff2ac98dd
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:28:26PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > On Fri, 8 May 2020 19:23:27 +0200, Benjamin Block wrote: > > > some time ago we noticed - Fedor did - that our DIV and DIX support in > > zfcp broke at some point. I tracked that down to a commit made for v5.4 > > (737eb78e82d5), but we didn't notice it back than, because our CI > > doesn't currently run with either DIV, nor DIX enabled (time allowing > > this is something we want to improve so we catch stuff like this > > earlier). It also turned out that the commit in v5.4 was not really the > > root-cause, and was only making the problem visible more easy. > > > > [...] > > Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks! > Thanks Martin!