Message ID | 1449788087-23282-1-git-send-email-ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 11/12/15 09:54, Uma Krishnan wrote: > From: Manoj Kumar <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > This drop enables a future card with a device id > of 0x0600 to be recognized by the cxlflash driver. > No card specific programming has been added. These > card specific changes will be staged in later. > > Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Without the card-specific code, how does the driver behave if the new card is plugged in? Andrew
On 12/13/2015 9:47 PM, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 11/12/15 09:54, Uma Krishnan wrote: >> From: Manoj Kumar <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> This drop enables a future card with a device id >> of 0x0600 to be recognized by the cxlflash driver. >> No card specific programming has been added. These >> card specific changes will be staged in later. >> >> Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Without the card-specific code, how does the driver behave if the new > card is plugged in? Andrew: As per the design, the Accelerator Function Unit (AFU) for this new IBM CXL Flash Adapater retains the same host interface as the previous generation. For the early prototypes of the new card, the driver with this change behaves exactly as the driver prior to this behaved with the earlier generation card. i.e. No card specific changes are required. However, I left the staging comment in there, in case later versions of the card deviate from the prototype. - Manoj -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Acked-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c index 021b526..ec26b12 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c @@ -2309,6 +2309,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template driver_template = { * Device dependent values */ static struct dev_dependent_vals dev_corsa_vals = { CXLFLASH_MAX_SECTORS }; +static struct dev_dependent_vals dev_flash_gt_vals = { CXLFLASH_MAX_SECTORS }; /* * PCI device binding table @@ -2316,6 +2317,8 @@ static struct dev_dependent_vals dev_corsa_vals = { CXLFLASH_MAX_SECTORS }; static struct pci_device_id cxlflash_pci_table[] = { {PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_CORSA, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, (kernel_ulong_t)&dev_corsa_vals}, + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_FLASH_GT, + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, (kernel_ulong_t)&dev_flash_gt_vals}, {} }; diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.h b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.h index ddc4a97..5d2c7ae 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.h @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ #define CXLFLASH_ADAPTER_NAME "IBM POWER CXL Flash Adapter" #define CXLFLASH_DRIVER_DATE "(October 26, 2015)" -#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_CORSA 0x04F0 -#define CXLFLASH_SUBS_DEV_ID 0x04F0 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_CORSA 0x04F0 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_IBM_FLASH_GT 0x0600 /* Since there is only one target, make it 0 */ #define CXLFLASH_TARGET 0