diff mbox

[v1,4/4] scsi: ufs: change device rails hpm mode ramp up sequence

Message ID 1477614384-5526-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

subhashj@codeaurora.org Oct. 28, 2016, 12:26 a.m. UTC
When we are resuming the UFS device rails in HPM mode, we are first
powering on the VCC rail while VCCQ and VCCQ2 rails still being in LPM
mode. Some UFS devices may take VCC on event as hint that host wants
UFS device to be resumed and may start drawing more power from the
VCCQ/VCCQ2 rails (while they are still in LPM mode) causing voltage drop
on these rails. This change fixes this issue by bringing VCCQ & VCCQ2 rails
out of LPM before powering on VCC rail.

Reviewed-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 9ed96ae..8cf5d8f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -5819,7 +5819,6 @@  static int ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	    !hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) {
 		ret = ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, true);
 	} else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
-		ret = ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, true);
 		if (!ret && !ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) {
 			ret = ufshcd_config_vreg_hpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq);
 			if (ret)
@@ -5828,6 +5827,7 @@  static int ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 			if (ret)
 				goto vccq_lpm;
 		}
+		ret = ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, true);
 	}
 	goto out;