From patchwork Sat Sep 30 00:34:38 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Smart X-Patchwork-Id: 9978903 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C606C6037F for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 00:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E90298D1 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 00:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id ADCD6298D5; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 00:35:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69204298D1 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 00:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752662AbdI3Af1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:35:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f196.google.com ([209.85.220.196]:34296 "EHLO mail-qk0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752605AbdI3AfH (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:35:07 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f196.google.com with SMTP id d70so783002qkc.1 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:35:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=a3wFf8+IHrdBFeBGnjylbidw2tZPafXQIGdcDKtu+DY=; b=RsEtPno/QIk/eLz02yTg8lGmbsH4Ee0bN0mFDQQyII2f24J+eGOOg2zWOjnok7xSsa KTq6SB6NJ7jqVLgFOhcoqxBf9qiVJrzy0kOQzp0m3DYRcnTXjiSCltyKhjLcNWyJXyCz ts4Ov/rZVhJGMomXJlAsC8hDujw+5l4jQYdlP7ve092ZouODGW/YkbkczzPz6GO9XMTL oCFiBP7kJz6USt1SBdFoHoC6zUgWiTJaeGKCwfaQxCSpHXF/JTu2QGhmtIj8W0WqqCDO goRy6V1hPCXtcuRdtPrBcTk7qch1G0M+uJ53/O2XUIG0iyqKP73kQA4vwSNxuA/0yfdf eliQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=a3wFf8+IHrdBFeBGnjylbidw2tZPafXQIGdcDKtu+DY=; b=ZoVssA3VwiV7Z4CvH++W5eHFaxceSmwJw4sjh4irSrXdLCiVOMsc0LUWRF/zWh9fHq Y1cCAebgzTo0vMYlJ3rPuWUeJU840+utaYWbrIWafPd4XpPb+2k8lSWtmNaYmk2hHmBy mmm5zoc3fBjhDQTW0PaPisbBZBWy0V3DXlRh2RcYEVwXpp/sTZeTlvP8xt1m1GNOS1Et iquA+6OOlpSHKN0KyA60iOC3AHEvBmrlrl6yeDtuyRyF891ofQEMI2tOZA98H0r6+/hN 2Qlp1rJZrzdCyZiiLKhD4KY57GFr0bCMoyMZgEzbsJiDgk7FLe4NxiSGh+2EXWKQ2R1G Lojg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXbfoEajYETGl2glrcwqY+xRjMk9SRYjL769mb5gVGNe2fK5NV9 aGGU3C19RgaF/zKvg9xaoyTOJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA1f3gOzciCg6vwZ3gE2YsUOxVns96BsvAAfr54t8xFftDuWux3GtjsGS9SosT3rUnh2EfetQ== X-Received: by 10.55.33.150 with SMTP id f22mr5484364qki.207.1506731706783; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pallmd1.broadcom.com ([192.19.255.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u32sm3596918qte.25.2017.09.29.17.35.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:35:06 -0700 (PDT) From: James Smart To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dick Kennedy , James Smart Subject: [PATCH v2 12/21] lpfc: Revise NVME module parameter descriptions for better clarity Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:34:38 -0700 Message-Id: <20170930003447.10747-13-jsmart2021@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.1 In-Reply-To: <20170930003447.10747-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> References: <20170930003447.10747-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Dick Kennedy The descriptions for lpfc_xri_split and lpfc_enable_fc4_type were poor. Revise for better understanding: lpfc_xri_split - Percentage of FCP XRI resources versus NVME lpfc_enable_fc4_type - Enable FC4 Protocol support - FCP / NVME Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy Signed-off-by: James Smart Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c index f02269b46049..65886646a16f 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c @@ -3375,7 +3375,7 @@ LPFC_ATTR_R(nvmet_mrq, */ LPFC_ATTR_R(enable_fc4_type, LPFC_ENABLE_FCP, LPFC_ENABLE_FCP, LPFC_ENABLE_BOTH, - "Define fc4 type to register with fabric."); + "Enable FC4 Protocol support - FCP / NVME"); /* * lpfc_xri_split: Defines the division of XRI resources between SCSI and NVME @@ -3391,7 +3391,7 @@ LPFC_ATTR_R(enable_fc4_type, LPFC_ENABLE_FCP, * percentage will go to NVME. */ LPFC_ATTR_R(xri_split, 50, 10, 90, - "Division of XRI resources between SCSI and NVME"); + "Percentage of FCP XRI resources versus NVME"); /* # lpfc_log_verbose: Only turn this flag on if you are willing to risk being