@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void blk_mq_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part,
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(q, blk_mq_check_inflight, &mi);
}
-void blk_freeze_queue_start(struct request_queue *q)
+bool blk_freeze_queue_start(struct request_queue *q)
{
int freeze_depth;
@@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ void blk_freeze_queue_start(struct request_queue *q)
percpu_ref_kill(&q->q_usage_counter);
if (q->mq_ops)
blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, false);
+ return true;
}
+ return false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_freeze_queue_start);
@@ -150,7 +152,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout);
* Guarantee no request is in use, so we can change any data structure of
* the queue afterward.
*/
-void blk_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
+bool blk_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
/*
* In the !blk_mq case we are only calling this to kill the
@@ -159,17 +161,18 @@ void blk_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* no blk_unfreeze_queue(), and blk_freeze_queue() is not
* exported to drivers as the only user for unfreeze is blk_mq.
*/
- blk_freeze_queue_start(q);
+ bool ret = blk_freeze_queue_start(q);
blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(q);
+ return ret;
}
-void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
+bool blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
/*
* ...just an alias to keep freeze and unfreeze actions balanced
* in the blk_mq_* namespace
*/
- blk_freeze_queue(q);
+ return blk_freeze_queue(q);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_freeze_queue);
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ struct blk_mq_ctx {
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async);
-void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
void blk_mq_free_queue(struct request_queue *q);
int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr);
void blk_mq_wake_waiters(struct request_queue *q);
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q);
void blk_queue_bypass_end(struct request_queue *q);
void __blk_queue_free_tags(struct request_queue *q);
-void blk_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
+bool blk_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
static inline void blk_queue_enter_live(struct request_queue *q)
{
@@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, bool async);
void blk_mq_delay_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs);
void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv);
-void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
+bool blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
void blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
-void blk_freeze_queue_start(struct request_queue *q);
+bool blk_freeze_queue_start(struct request_queue *q);
void blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(struct request_queue *q);
int blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(struct request_queue *q,
unsigned long timeout);
We need this return value in the following patch to decide if a explicit synchronize_rcu() is needed. Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> --- block/blk-mq.c | 13 ++++++++----- block/blk-mq.h | 1 - block/blk.h | 2 +- include/linux/blk-mq.h | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)