Message ID | 20171219200254.23120-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 12:02 -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > This patch introduces sysfs entries to show the information. What information does "the information" refer to? Regarding the patch title: I think this patch introduces new sysfs attributes instead of using existing sysfs entries. If so, please reflect this in the patch title. > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/eol > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/length > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/lifetimeA > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/lifetimeB > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/type What is the meaning of the above shell commands in the context of the patch description? > struct desc_field_offset health_desc_field_name[] = { > {"bLength", 0x00, BYTE}, > {"bDescriptorType", 0x01, BYTE}, > {"bPreEOLInfo", 0x02, BYTE}, > {"bDeviceLifeTimeEstA", 0x03, BYTE}, > {"bDeviceLifeTimeEstB", 0x04, BYTE} > }; Why has the above data been mentioned in the patch description? > bPreEOLInfo > - 00h: Not defined > - 01h: Normal > - 02h: Warning > - 03h: Critical > > bDeviceLifeTimeEstA > - 00h: Not defined > - 01h: 0% ~ 10% device life time used > - 02h: 10% ~ 20% device life time used > - 03h: 20% ~ 30% device life time used > - 04h: 30% ~ 40% device life time used > - 05h: 40% ~ 50% device life time used > - 06h: 50% ~ 60% device life time used > - 07h: 60% ~ 70% device life time used > - 08h: 70% ~ 80% device life time used > - 09h: 80% ~ 90% device life time used > - 0Ah: 90% ~ 100% device life time used > - 0Bh: Exceeded its maximum estimated device life time Again, why has the above information been mentioned in the patch description? > +static ssize_t health_attr_show(struct device *dev, > + struct health_attr *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + int buff_len = hba->desc_size.health_desc; > + u8 desc_buf[hba->desc_size.health_desc]; Is desc_buf[] a variable-length array? If so, how big can hba->desc_size.health_desc be? Can that number have a negative value? > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%02x", desc_buf[attr->bytes]); Please check whether attr->bytes falls inside the bounds of the desc_buf[] array before using that value as an index. > +#define HEALTH_ATTR_RO(_name, _bytes) \ > +static struct health_attr ufs_health_##_name = { \ > + .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = 0444}, \ > + .show = health_attr_show, \ > + .bytes = _bytes, \ > +} > + > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(length, 0); > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(type, 1); > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(eol, 2); > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(lifetimeA, 3); > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(lifetimeB, 4); The above makes clear that the value stored in the structure member with the name "bytes" represents an array index. Please choose a better name for that structure member. Additionally, since this patch introduces new sysfs attributes, why doesn't it add any documentation under Documentation/ABI/? Thanks, Bart.
On 12/19, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 12:02 -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > This patch introduces sysfs entries to show the information. > > What information does "the information" refer to? > > Regarding the patch title: I think this patch introduces new sysfs attributes > instead of using existing sysfs entries. If so, please reflect this in the patch > title. > > > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/eol > > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/length > > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/lifetimeA > > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/lifetimeB > > # cat /sys/devices/soc/1da4000.ufshc/health/type > > What is the meaning of the above shell commands in the context of the patch > description? > > > struct desc_field_offset health_desc_field_name[] = { > > {"bLength", 0x00, BYTE}, > > {"bDescriptorType", 0x01, BYTE}, > > {"bPreEOLInfo", 0x02, BYTE}, > > {"bDeviceLifeTimeEstA", 0x03, BYTE}, > > {"bDeviceLifeTimeEstB", 0x04, BYTE} > > }; > > Why has the above data been mentioned in the patch description? > > > bPreEOLInfo > > - 00h: Not defined > > - 01h: Normal > > - 02h: Warning > > - 03h: Critical > > > > bDeviceLifeTimeEstA > > - 00h: Not defined > > - 01h: 0% ~ 10% device life time used > > - 02h: 10% ~ 20% device life time used > > - 03h: 20% ~ 30% device life time used > > - 04h: 30% ~ 40% device life time used > > - 05h: 40% ~ 50% device life time used > > - 06h: 50% ~ 60% device life time used > > - 07h: 60% ~ 70% device life time used > > - 08h: 70% ~ 80% device life time used > > - 09h: 80% ~ 90% device life time used > > - 0Ah: 90% ~ 100% device life time used > > - 0Bh: Exceeded its maximum estimated device life time > > Again, why has the above information been mentioned in the patch description? Let me send v2. > > > +static ssize_t health_attr_show(struct device *dev, > > + struct health_attr *attr, char *buf) > > +{ > > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > + int buff_len = hba->desc_size.health_desc; > > + u8 desc_buf[hba->desc_size.health_desc]; > > Is desc_buf[] a variable-length array? If so, how big can > hba->desc_size.health_desc be? Can that number have a negative value? IIUC, it is given by UFS which must be valid. Otherwise, it should be QUERY_DESC_HEALTH_DEF_SIZE which is valid again. This is similarly being done in other sysfs entries here. > > > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%02x", desc_buf[attr->bytes]); > > Please check whether attr->bytes falls inside the bounds of the desc_buf[] array > before using that value as an index. Okay. > > > +#define HEALTH_ATTR_RO(_name, _bytes) \ > > +static struct health_attr ufs_health_##_name = { \ > > + .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = 0444}, \ > > + .show = health_attr_show, \ > > + .bytes = _bytes, \ > > +} > > + > > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(length, 0); > > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(type, 1); > > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(eol, 2); > > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(lifetimeA, 3); > > +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(lifetimeB, 4); > > The above makes clear that the value stored in the structure member with the name > "bytes" represents an array index. Please choose a better name for that structure > member. Changed to byte_offset. > Additionally, since this patch introduces new sysfs attributes, why doesn't it > add any documentation under Documentation/ABI/? Added. Thanks, > > Thanks, > > Bart.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h index 54deeb754db5..1af541d56c7d 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ enum desc_idn { QUERY_DESC_IDN_RFU_1 = 0x6, QUERY_DESC_IDN_GEOMETRY = 0x7, QUERY_DESC_IDN_POWER = 0x8, + QUERY_DESC_IDN_HEALTH = 0x9, QUERY_DESC_IDN_MAX, }; @@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ enum ufs_desc_def_size { QUERY_DESC_INTERCONNECT_DEF_SIZE = 0x06, QUERY_DESC_GEOMETRY_DEF_SIZE = 0x44, QUERY_DESC_POWER_DEF_SIZE = 0x62, + QUERY_DESC_HEALTH_DEF_SIZE = 0x25, }; /* Unit descriptor parameters offsets in bytes*/ diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index 12ff7daebb00..6809f1786efe 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -2991,6 +2991,9 @@ int ufshcd_map_desc_id_to_length(struct ufs_hba *hba, case QUERY_DESC_IDN_RFU_1: *desc_len = 0; break; + case QUERY_DESC_IDN_HEALTH: + *desc_len = hba->desc_size.health_desc; + break; default: *desc_len = 0; return -EINVAL; @@ -6298,6 +6301,11 @@ static void ufshcd_init_desc_sizes(struct ufs_hba *hba) &hba->desc_size.geom_desc); if (err) hba->desc_size.geom_desc = QUERY_DESC_GEOMETRY_DEF_SIZE; + + err = ufshcd_read_desc_length(hba, QUERY_DESC_IDN_HEALTH, 0, + &hba->desc_size.health_desc); + if (err) + hba->desc_size.health_desc = QUERY_DESC_HEALTH_DEF_SIZE; } static void ufshcd_def_desc_sizes(struct ufs_hba *hba) @@ -6308,6 +6316,7 @@ static void ufshcd_def_desc_sizes(struct ufs_hba *hba) hba->desc_size.conf_desc = QUERY_DESC_CONFIGURATION_DEF_SIZE; hba->desc_size.unit_desc = QUERY_DESC_UNIT_DEF_SIZE; hba->desc_size.geom_desc = QUERY_DESC_GEOMETRY_DEF_SIZE; + hba->desc_size.health_desc = QUERY_DESC_HEALTH_DEF_SIZE; } /** @@ -7688,14 +7697,69 @@ static const struct attribute_group ufshcd_attr_group = { .attrs = ufshcd_attrs, }; +struct health_attr { + struct attribute attr; + ssize_t (*show)(struct device *dev, + struct health_attr *attr, char *buf); + int bytes; +}; + +static ssize_t health_attr_show(struct device *dev, + struct health_attr *attr, char *buf) +{ + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + int buff_len = hba->desc_size.health_desc; + u8 desc_buf[hba->desc_size.health_desc]; + int err; + + pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev); + err = ufshcd_read_desc(hba, QUERY_DESC_IDN_HEALTH, 0, + desc_buf, buff_len); + pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev); + if (err) + return 0; + + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%02x", desc_buf[attr->bytes]); +} + +#define HEALTH_ATTR_RO(_name, _bytes) \ +static struct health_attr ufs_health_##_name = { \ + .attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = 0444}, \ + .show = health_attr_show, \ + .bytes = _bytes, \ +} + +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(length, 0); +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(type, 1); +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(eol, 2); +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(lifetimeA, 3); +HEALTH_ATTR_RO(lifetimeB, 4); + +static struct attribute *ufshcd_health_attrs[] = { + &ufs_health_length.attr, + &ufs_health_type.attr, + &ufs_health_eol.attr, + &ufs_health_lifetimeA.attr, + &ufs_health_lifetimeB.attr, + NULL +}; + +static const struct attribute_group ufshcd_health_attr_group = { + .name = "health", + .attrs = ufshcd_health_attrs, +}; + static inline void ufshcd_add_sysfs_nodes(struct ufs_hba *hba) { if (sysfs_create_group(&hba->dev->kobj, &ufshcd_attr_group)) - dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to create sysfs group\n"); + dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to create default sysfs group\n"); + if (sysfs_create_group(&hba->dev->kobj, &ufshcd_health_attr_group)) + dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to create health sysfs group\n"); } static inline void ufshcd_remove_sysfs_nodes(struct ufs_hba *hba) { + sysfs_remove_group(&hba->dev->kobj, &ufshcd_health_attr_group); sysfs_remove_group(&hba->dev->kobj, &ufshcd_attr_group); } diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h index 56e26eb15185..ba44cbcf755e 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct ufs_desc_size { int interc_desc; int unit_desc; int conf_desc; + int health_desc; }; /**