diff mbox

答复: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Replace sdev_printk with printk_deferred to avoid

Message ID 20180328024422.GA1352@jagdpanzerIV (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Sergey Senozhatsky March 28, 2018, 2:44 a.m. UTC 
On (03/28/18 10:29), wen.yang99@zte.com.cn wrote:
>    Hello Bart,
>
>    We have a detailed discussion of the problem.
>    Sergey Senozhatsky, Petr and many people have made a lot of efforts about
>    it.
>    Please see this link:
>    https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199003
>
>    1, Petr suggests that it should be modified in this way:
>    IMHO, printing the same message so many times is useless. Therefore
>    some throttling would make sense. If we want to keep sdev_printk(),

The thing with retelimiting is that - yes, we do less printks but we still
do them under queue spin_lock.

So I was thinking about something like below [a quick-n-dirty workaround]

---

 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 0dfec0dedd5e..6c930fbdd24c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1825,9 +1825,13 @@  static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 			break;
 
 		if (unlikely(!scsi_device_online(sdev))) {
+			scsi_kill_request(req, q);
+			spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+
 			sdev_printk(KERN_ERR, sdev,
 				    "rejecting I/O to offline device\n");
-			scsi_kill_request(req, q);
+
+			spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 			continue;
 		}