From patchwork Sat May 9 23:45:54 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Al Viro X-Patchwork-Id: 11538553 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59BB14C0 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 23:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB9721775 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 23:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728945AbgEIXqL (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 19:46:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728918AbgEIXqI (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 19:46:08 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C155C061A0C; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jXZAO-004iSV-BF; Sat, 09 May 2020 23:46:00 +0000 From: Al Viro To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, James Smart , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 17/20] lpfc_debugfs: get rid of pointless access_ok() Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 00:45:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20200509234557.1124086-17-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.4 In-Reply-To: <20200509234557.1124086-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200509234124.GM23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200509234557.1124086-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org From: Al Viro No, you do NOT need to "protect copy from user" that way. Incidentally, your userland ABI stinks. I understand that you wanted to accept "reset" and "reset\n" as equivalent, but I suspect that accepting "reset this, you !@^!@!" had been an accident. Nothing to do about that now - it is a userland ABI... Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c index 8a6e02aa553f..5a754fb5f854 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c @@ -2166,10 +2166,6 @@ lpfc_debugfs_lockstat_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, char *pbuf; int i; - /* Protect copy from user */ - if (!access_ok(buf, nbytes)) - return -EFAULT; - memset(mybuf, 0, sizeof(mybuf)); if (copy_from_user(mybuf, buf, nbytes)) @@ -2621,10 +2617,6 @@ lpfc_debugfs_multixripools_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, if (nbytes > 64) nbytes = 64; - /* Protect copy from user */ - if (!access_ok(buf, nbytes)) - return -EFAULT; - memset(mybuf, 0, sizeof(mybuf)); if (copy_from_user(mybuf, buf, nbytes)) @@ -2787,10 +2779,6 @@ lpfc_debugfs_scsistat_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, char mybuf[6] = {0}; int i; - /* Protect copy from user */ - if (!access_ok(buf, nbytes)) - return -EFAULT; - if (copy_from_user(mybuf, buf, (nbytes >= sizeof(mybuf)) ? (sizeof(mybuf) - 1) : nbytes)) return -EFAULT;