@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static void ibmvfc_npiv_logout(struct ibmvfc_host *);
static void ibmvfc_tgt_implicit_logout_and_del(struct ibmvfc_target *);
static void ibmvfc_tgt_move_login(struct ibmvfc_target *);
+static void ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *);
+static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *);
+
static const char *unknown_error = "unknown error";
static long h_reg_sub_crq(unsigned long unit_address, unsigned long ioba,
@@ -926,8 +929,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
unsigned long flags;
struct vio_dev *vdev = to_vio_dev(vhost->dev);
struct ibmvfc_queue *crq = &vhost->crq;
- struct ibmvfc_queue *scrq;
- int i;
+
+ ibmvfc_release_sub_crqs(vhost);
/* Close the CRQ */
do {
@@ -947,16 +950,6 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
memset(crq->msgs.crq, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
crq->cur = 0;
- if (vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs) {
- for (i = 0; i < nr_scsi_hw_queues; i++) {
- scrq = &vhost->scsi_scrqs.scrqs[i];
- spin_lock(scrq->q_lock);
- memset(scrq->msgs.scrq, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
- scrq->cur = 0;
- spin_unlock(scrq->q_lock);
- }
- }
-
/* And re-open it again */
rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_REG_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
crq->msg_token, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -966,6 +959,9 @@ static int ibmvfc_reset_crq(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Partner adapter not ready\n");
else if (rc != 0)
dev_warn(vhost->dev, "Couldn't register crq (rc=%d)\n", rc);
+
+ ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(vhost);
+
spin_unlock(vhost->crq.q_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
@@ -5692,6 +5688,7 @@ static void ibmvfc_deregister_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, int index)
free_irq(scrq->irq, scrq);
irq_dispose_mapping(scrq->irq);
+ scrq->irq = 0;
do {
rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
A hard reset results in a complete transport disconnect such that the CRQ connection with the partner VIOS is broken. This has the side effect of also invalidating the associated sub-CRQs. The current code assumes that the sub-CRQs are perserved resulting in a protocol violation after trying to reconnect them with the VIOS. This introduces an infinite loop such that the VIOS forces a disconnect after each subsequent attempt to re-register with invalid handles. Avoid the aforementioned issue by releasing the sub-CRQs prior to CRQ disconnect, and driving a reinitialization of the sub-CRQs once a new CRQ is registered with the hypervisor. fixes: faacf8c5f1d5 ("ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com> --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)