| Message ID | 20230921225435.3537728-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ibmvfc: fixes and generic prep work for NVMeoF support | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index 2bfeeb9ace01..30baa046ae5b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ #include <linux/bsg-lib.h> #include <asm/firmware.h> #include <asm/irq.h> -#include <asm/rtas.h> #include <asm/vio.h> #include <scsi/scsi.h> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h> @@ -5952,7 +5951,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, irq_failed: do { rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); - } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc)); + } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); reg_failed: LEAVE; return rc;
Commit 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup") wrongly changed the busy loop check to use rtas_busy_delay() instead of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). The busy return codes for RTAS and hypercalls are not the same. Fix this issue by restoring the use of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). Fixes: 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)