From patchwork Wed Jun 19 09:17:42 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: yangxingui X-Patchwork-Id: 13703567 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A4681745; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718788859; cv=none; b=OEvu8WTr4KtnXfVd65Jaa/DrVEuUQCuIVGBX3vnHNKktQLR6pcFiRsaM+g9Kn8d+AbKo9argZC9ayyHJq1Ziv+tENA0u8cGMT8VaST3kKfACMsw1laVJ7rqCu6dKdvHvDEkBNGJxgxw7Zc0fH0Wty1wFA0FGgQpmUeL5Ailevcs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718788859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nWxnAHkH9EaDyBp2ZTIMJ77gQnhpRlBZNAbqWRilES8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KT5kCYTz7fYxKV+wRABRuzIzhs4TQVeOIe0f2YJHBll/4rje0IYN2S6geDi2IJd4a+cifOqmgGUMpg1mjGgXeNuvykxG863p1GRcNjroytlPiLgQUhFWeMUX9ULQ5yY5zwKtbDf/mA0bYed8kmj38rbyylaoqOZhAU0xs3smisE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.48]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W3ygb6kt6zPr8S; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:17:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemd100001.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.94]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECB518007A; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:20:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.50.165.33) by dggpemd100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.34; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:20:48 +0800 From: Xingui Yang To: , , , , CC: , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v5] scsi: libsas: Fix exp-attached end device cannot be scanned in again after probe failed Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:17:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20240619091742.25465-1-yangxingui@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemd100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.94) The expander phy will be treated as broadcast flutter in the next revalidation after the exp-attached end device probe failed, as follows: [78779.654026] sas: broadcast received: 0 [78779.654037] sas: REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10 [78779.654680] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 change count has changed [78779.662977] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 originated BROADCAST(CHANGE) [78779.662986] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 new device attached [78779.663079] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05:U:8 attached: 500e004aaaaaaa05 (stp) [78779.693542] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: dev[16:5] found [78779.701155] sas: done REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10, res 0x0 [78779.707864] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0 ... [78835.161307] sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1 [78835.171344] sas: sas_probe_sata: for exp-attached device 500e004aaaaaaa05 returned -19 [78835.180879] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: dev[16:5] is gone [78835.187487] sas: broadcast received: 0 [78835.187504] sas: REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10 [78835.188263] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 change count has changed [78835.195870] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 originated BROADCAST(CHANGE) [78835.195875] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f rediscovering phy05 [78835.196022] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05:U:A attached: 500e004aaaaaaa05 (stp) [78835.196026] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 broadcast flutter [78835.197615] sas: done REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10, res 0x0 The cause of the problem is that the related ex_phy's attached_sas_addr was not cleared after the end device probe failed, so reset it. Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang Reviewed-by: John Garry --- Changes since v4: - Optimize code and comments based on John's suggestion. Changes since v3: - Just manually clear the ex_phy's attached_sas_addr instead of calling sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr() and deleting the port. - Update commit information. Changes since v2: - Add a helper for calling sas_destruct_devices() and sas_destruct_ports(), and put the new call at the end of sas_probe_devices() based on John's suggestion. Changes since v1: - Simplify the process of getting ex_phy id based on Jason's suggestion. - Update commit information. --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h index 85948963fb97..03d6ec1eb970 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h @@ -145,6 +145,20 @@ static inline void sas_fail_probe(struct domain_device *dev, const char *func, i func, dev->parent ? "exp-attached" : "direct-attached", SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), err); + + /* + * If the device probe failed, the expander phy attached address + * needs to be reset so that the phy will not be treated as flutter + * in the next revalidation + */ + if (dev->parent && !dev_is_expander(dev->dev_type)) { + struct sas_phy *phy = dev->phy; + struct domain_device *parent = dev->parent; + struct ex_phy *ex_phy = &parent->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy->number]; + + memset(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); + } + sas_unregister_dev(dev->port, dev); }