Message ID | 4c7efa89883829e21a09e558139e5d8a0d94dee0.1543374820.git.gustavo@embeddedor.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Deferred |
Headers | show |
Series | scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs | expand |
Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks
Hi, Friendly ping (second one): Who can ack/review/take this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with > "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is expecting to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c > index baed2b891efb..0eeed6c4c2ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c > @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, > > break; > } > - /* Drop thru */ > + /* fall through */ > case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT: > /* > * For WRITE_INSERT, force the error > @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, > rc = BG_ERR_TGT | BG_ERR_CHECK; > break; > } > - /* Drop thru */ > + /* fall through */ > case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT: > /* > * For WRITE_INSERT, force the > @@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, > switch (op) { > case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_PASS: > rc = BG_ERR_CHECK; > - /* Drop thru */ > + /* fall through */ > > case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT: > /* > @@ -4115,7 +4115,7 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn, > lpfc_cmd->cur_iocbq.sli4_lxritag, > 0, 0); > } > - /* else: fall through */ > + /* fall through */ > default: > cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16; > break; >
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c index baed2b891efb..0eeed6c4c2ee 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, break; } - /* Drop thru */ + /* fall through */ case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT: /* * For WRITE_INSERT, force the error @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, rc = BG_ERR_TGT | BG_ERR_CHECK; break; } - /* Drop thru */ + /* fall through */ case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT: /* * For WRITE_INSERT, force the @@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, switch (op) { case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_PASS: rc = BG_ERR_CHECK; - /* Drop thru */ + /* fall through */ case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT: /* @@ -4115,7 +4115,7 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn, lpfc_cmd->cur_iocbq.sli4_lxritag, 0, 0); } - /* else: fall through */ + /* fall through */ default: cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16; break;
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)