Message ID | 577d8249.a10c420a.da50c.ffff953e@mx.google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Rejected, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:12:12AM +0800, tom.ty89@gmail.com wrote: > From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> > > SAT (as of sat4r05f.pdf) does not require this vendor specific > designator. Besides, we already have the Unit Serial Number VPD. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > index bfec66f..9f478ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > @@ -2210,14 +2210,6 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsiop_inq_83(struct ata_scsi_args *args, u8 *rbuf) > rbuf[1] = 0x83; /* this page code */ > num = 4; > > - /* piv=0, assoc=lu, code_set=ACSII, designator=vendor */ > - rbuf[num + 0] = 2; > - rbuf[num + 3] = ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN; > - num += 4; > - ata_id_string(args->id, (unsigned char *) rbuf + num, > - ATA_ID_SERNO, ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN); > - num += ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN; > - If it isn't actually broken, I don't want to change it. It's a userland visible change which is gratuitous. Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c index bfec66f..9f478ad 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c @@ -2210,14 +2210,6 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsiop_inq_83(struct ata_scsi_args *args, u8 *rbuf) rbuf[1] = 0x83; /* this page code */ num = 4; - /* piv=0, assoc=lu, code_set=ACSII, designator=vendor */ - rbuf[num + 0] = 2; - rbuf[num + 3] = ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN; - num += 4; - ata_id_string(args->id, (unsigned char *) rbuf + num, - ATA_ID_SERNO, ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN); - num += ATA_ID_SERNO_LEN; - /* SAT defined lu model and serial numbers descriptor */ /* piv=0, assoc=lu, code_set=ACSII, designator=t10 vendor id */ rbuf[num + 0] = 2;