Message ID | 20231031123207.758655-1-omosnace@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | lsm: fix default return values for some hooks | expand |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:32 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> wrote: > > Some of the default return values listed in <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h> > don't match the actual no-op value and can be trivially fixed. > > Ondrej Mosnacek (2): > lsm: fix default return value for vm_enough_memory > lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) These both look like reasonable -stable candidates to me, what do you think?
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:12 AM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:32 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Some of the default return values listed in <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h> > > don't match the actual no-op value and can be trivially fixed. > > > > Ondrej Mosnacek (2): > > lsm: fix default return value for vm_enough_memory > > lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx > > > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > These both look like reasonable -stable candidates to me, what do you think? Yes, that would be my assessment as well.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:30 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:12 AM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:32 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Some of the default return values listed in <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h> > > > don't match the actual no-op value and can be trivially fixed. > > > > > > Ondrej Mosnacek (2): > > > lsm: fix default return value for vm_enough_memory > > > lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx > > > > > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > These both look like reasonable -stable candidates to me, what do you think? > > Yes, that would be my assessment as well. Okay, good. I've just gone ahead and merged these into lsm/stable-6.7 and I'll plan to send them up to Linus on Thursday or Friday this week. Thanks.