Message ID | 1604737451-19082-2-git-send-email-jrdr.linux@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] tomoyo: Convert get_user_pages*() to pin_user_pages*() | expand |
On 11/7/20 12:24 AM, Souptick Joarder wrote: > Fixed typo s/Poiner/Pointer > > Fixes: 5b636857fee6 ("TOMOYO: Allow using argv[]/envp[] of execve() as conditions.") > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> > --- > security/tomoyo/domain.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/tomoyo/domain.c b/security/tomoyo/domain.c > index bd748be..7b2babe 100644 > --- a/security/tomoyo/domain.c > +++ b/security/tomoyo/domain.c > @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ int tomoyo_find_next_domain(struct linux_binprm *bprm) > * > * @bprm: Pointer to "struct linux_binprm". > * @pos: Location to dump. > - * @dump: Poiner to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". > + * @dump: Pointer to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". Not worth a separate patch, especially since the original comment is merely copying the C sources, and as such, does not add any value. I'd either a) craft a new documentation line that adds some value, or b) just merge this patch into the previous one, and make a note in the commit description to the effect that you've included a trivial typo fix as long as you're there. thanks,
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 2:27 PM John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote: > > On 11/7/20 12:24 AM, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > Fixed typo s/Poiner/Pointer > > > > Fixes: 5b636857fee6 ("TOMOYO: Allow using argv[]/envp[] of execve() as conditions.") > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> > > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> > > --- > > security/tomoyo/domain.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/security/tomoyo/domain.c b/security/tomoyo/domain.c > > index bd748be..7b2babe 100644 > > --- a/security/tomoyo/domain.c > > +++ b/security/tomoyo/domain.c > > @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ int tomoyo_find_next_domain(struct linux_binprm *bprm) > > * > > * @bprm: Pointer to "struct linux_binprm". > > * @pos: Location to dump. > > - * @dump: Poiner to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". > > + * @dump: Pointer to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". > > Not worth a separate patch, especially since the original comment is merely > copying the C sources, and as such, does not add any value. > > I'd either a) craft a new documentation line that adds some value, or b) just > merge this patch into the previous one, and make a note in the commit > description to the effect that you've included a trivial typo fix as long > as you're there. > John, as patch[1/2] is dropped, can we take this patch forward with some more updates in documentations ?
On 11/8/20 7:41 PM, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 2:27 PM John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/7/20 12:24 AM, Souptick Joarder wrote: >>> Fixed typo s/Poiner/Pointer >>> >>> Fixes: 5b636857fee6 ("TOMOYO: Allow using argv[]/envp[] of execve() as conditions.") >>> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> >>> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> >>> --- >>> security/tomoyo/domain.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/security/tomoyo/domain.c b/security/tomoyo/domain.c >>> index bd748be..7b2babe 100644 >>> --- a/security/tomoyo/domain.c >>> +++ b/security/tomoyo/domain.c >>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ int tomoyo_find_next_domain(struct linux_binprm *bprm) >>> * >>> * @bprm: Pointer to "struct linux_binprm". >>> * @pos: Location to dump. >>> - * @dump: Poiner to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". >>> + * @dump: Pointer to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". >> >> Not worth a separate patch, especially since the original comment is merely >> copying the C sources, and as such, does not add any value. >> >> I'd either a) craft a new documentation line that adds some value, or b) just >> merge this patch into the previous one, and make a note in the commit >> description to the effect that you've included a trivial typo fix as long >> as you're there. >> > > John, as patch[1/2] is dropped, can we take this patch forward with some more > updates in documentations ? > That's really up to the folks who work on this code. Personally I would rarely post a patch *just* for this, but on the other hand it is a correction. Either way is fine with me of course. thanks,
On 2020/11/09 13:17, John Hubbard wrote: > On 11/8/20 7:41 PM, Souptick Joarder wrote: >> John, as patch[1/2] is dropped, can we take this patch forward with some more >> updates in documentations ? >> > > That's really up to the folks who work on this code. Personally I would rarely > post a patch *just* for this, but on the other hand it is a correction. Either > way is fine with me of course. Xiaoming Ni has posted a patch for fixing spelling errors in security/ directory at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200822030534.2577-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com . James, can we apply that patch? Or, should we split that patch into each subsystem?
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2020/11/09 13:17, John Hubbard wrote: > > On 11/8/20 7:41 PM, Souptick Joarder wrote: > >> John, as patch[1/2] is dropped, can we take this patch forward with some more > >> updates in documentations ? > >> > > > > That's really up to the folks who work on this code. Personally I would rarely > > post a patch *just* for this, but on the other hand it is a correction. Either > > way is fine with me of course. > > Xiaoming Ni has posted a patch for fixing spelling errors in security/ directory > at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200822030534.2577-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com . > > James, can we apply that patch? Or, should we split that patch into each subsystem? > Probably easiest to go via my tree, the author should resend and include me on the To: line.
diff --git a/security/tomoyo/domain.c b/security/tomoyo/domain.c index bd748be..7b2babe 100644 --- a/security/tomoyo/domain.c +++ b/security/tomoyo/domain.c @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ int tomoyo_find_next_domain(struct linux_binprm *bprm) * * @bprm: Pointer to "struct linux_binprm". * @pos: Location to dump. - * @dump: Poiner to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". + * @dump: Pointer to "struct tomoyo_page_dump". * * Returns true on success, false otherwise. */
Fixed typo s/Poiner/Pointer Fixes: 5b636857fee6 ("TOMOYO: Allow using argv[]/envp[] of execve() as conditions.") Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> --- security/tomoyo/domain.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)