@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ __setup("ima_appraise=", default_appraise_setup);
*/
bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void)
{
- return (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) ? 1 : 0;
+ return ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
}
/*
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST))
return -EINVAL;
ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry),
- (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) ? 1 : 0);
+ xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG);
result = 0;
}
return result;
A non-zero value is converted to 1 when assigned to a bool variable, so the conditional operator in is_ima_appraise_enabled is redundant. The value of a comparison operator is either 1 or 0 so the conditional operator in ima_inode_setxattr is redundant as well. Confirmed that the patch is correct by comparing the object file from before and after the patch. They are identical. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html