| Message ID | 20180223211235.2402024-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > A missing 'struct' keyword caused a build error when CONFIG_NETLABEL > is disabled: > > In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99: > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type name 'sock' > static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk) > ^~~~ > security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone': > security/selinux/hooks.c:5188:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Fixes: db97c9f9d312 ("selinux: Add SCTP support") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Thanks, merged and pushed to selinux/next. Richard was going to submit a patch for that, but I don't think he would mind you beating him :) > diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > index 6ef4953431dc..8671de09c363 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > +++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ static inline void selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family) > { > return; > } > -static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk) > +static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, > + struct sock *newsk) > { > return; > } > -- > 2.9.0 >
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 16:25 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > A missing 'struct' keyword caused a build error when > > CONFIG_NETLABEL > > is disabled: > > > > In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99: > > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type > > name 'sock' > > static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, > > sock *newsk) > > ^ > > ~~~ > > security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone': > > security/selinux/hooks.c:5188:2: error: implicit declaration of > > function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean > > 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function- > > declaration] > > > > Fixes: db97c9f9d312 ("selinux: Add SCTP support") > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > --- > > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Thanks, merged and pushed to selinux/next. > > Richard was going to submit a patch for that, but I don't think he > would mind you beating him :) Don't mind at all. What I will do then is fix the problem highlighted by [1] that affects "[PATCH V7 2/4] sctp: Add ip option support", I'll issue a V8 asap. [1] https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all/2018-February/043695.html > > > diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > > b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > > index 6ef4953431dc..8671de09c363 100644 > > --- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > > +++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h > > @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ static inline void > > selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family) > > { > > return; > > } > > -static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, > > sock *newsk) > > +static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, > > + struct sock *newsk) > > { > > return; > > } > > -- > > 2.9.0 > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h index 6ef4953431dc..8671de09c363 100644 --- a/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h +++ b/security/selinux/include/netlabel.h @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ static inline void selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family) { return; } -static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk) +static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, + struct sock *newsk) { return; }
A missing 'struct' keyword caused a build error when CONFIG_NETLABEL is disabled: In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99: security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type name 'sock' static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk, sock *newsk) ^~~~ security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone': security/selinux/hooks.c:5188:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Fixes: db97c9f9d312 ("selinux: Add SCTP support") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- security/selinux/include/netlabel.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)