diff mbox series

[5/5] ima: Remove unused build_ima_appraise variable

Message ID 20200325161455.7610-2-roberto.sassu@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/5] ima: Set file->f_mode instead of file->f_flags in ima_calc_file_hash() | expand

Commit Message

Roberto Sassu March 25, 2020, 4:14 p.m. UTC
From: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>

After adding the new add_rule() function in commit c52657d93b05
("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()"), all appraisal flags are added to the
temp_ima_appraise variable. Remove build_ima_appraise that is not set
anymore.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Mimi Zohar April 22, 2020, 10:59 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Roberto, Krzysztof,

On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 17:14 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
> 
> After adding the new add_rule() function in commit c52657d93b05
> ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()"), all appraisal flags are added to the
> temp_ima_appraise variable. Remove build_ima_appraise that is not set
> anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index ea9b991f0232..fcc26bddd7fc 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@
>  
>  int ima_policy_flag;
>  static int temp_ima_appraise;
> -static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init;
>  
>  #define MAX_LSM_RULES 6
>  enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE,
> @@ -606,7 +605,7 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void)
>  			ima_policy_flag |= entry->action;
>  	}
>  
> -	ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise);
> +	ima_appraise |= temp_ima_appraise;

You're correct that build_ima_appraise isn't being used any longer,
but ima_appraise isn't defined as __ro_after_init.  Instead of
removing build_ima_appraise, does it make sense to set it?

Mimi

>  	if (!ima_appraise)
>  		ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE;
>  }
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index ea9b991f0232..fcc26bddd7fc 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ 
 
 int ima_policy_flag;
 static int temp_ima_appraise;
-static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init;
 
 #define MAX_LSM_RULES 6
 enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE,
@@ -606,7 +605,7 @@  void ima_update_policy_flag(void)
 			ima_policy_flag |= entry->action;
 	}
 
-	ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise);
+	ima_appraise |= temp_ima_appraise;
 	if (!ima_appraise)
 		ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE;
 }