From patchwork Fri Sep 4 09:26:41 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11756451 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6A8109A for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EB2205CB for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726597AbgIDJcA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 05:32:00 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2763 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730113AbgIDJbb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 05:31:31 -0400 Received: from lhreml727-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5CD0B895E4646F83E718; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:31:30 +0100 (IST) Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by lhreml727-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:31:29 +0100 Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.160) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:31:29 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v2 10/12] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM portable signatures Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:26:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20200904092643.20013-6-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20200904092339.19598-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20200904092339.19598-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.160] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: System administrators can require that all accessed files have a signature by specifying appraise_type=imasig in a policy rule. Currently, IMA signatures satisfy this requirement. Appended signatures may also satisfy this requirement, but are not applicable as IMA signatures. IMA/appended signatures ensure data source authentication for file content and prevent any change. EVM signatures instead ensure data source authentication for file metadata. Given that the digest or signature of the file content must be included in the metadata, EVM signatures provide the same file data guarantees of IMA signatures, as well as providing file metadata guarantees. This patch lets systems protected with EVM signatures pass appraisal verification if the appraise_type=imasig requirement is specified in the policy. This facilitates deployment in the scenarios where only EVM signatures are available. The patch makes the following changes: file xattr types: security.ima: IMA_XATTR_DIGEST/IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG security.evm: EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG execve(), mmap(), open() behavior (with appraise_type=imasig): before: denied (file without IMA signature, imasig requirement not met) after: allowed (file with EVM portable signature, imasig requirement met) open(O_WRONLY) behavior (without appraise_type=imasig): before: allowed (file without IMA signature, not immutable) after: denied (file with EVM portable signature, immutable) In addition, similarly to IMA signatures, this patch temporarily allows new files without or with incomplete metadata to be opened so that content can be written. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 22 +++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 4d682bc3a77f..95c7a1fc0d01 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -225,12 +225,16 @@ static int xattr_verify(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, hash_start = 1; fallthrough; case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST: - if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { - *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; - *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; - break; + if (*status != INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE) { + if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + break; + } + clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); + } else { + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); } - clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); if (xattr_len - sizeof(xattr_value->type) - hash_start >= iint->ima_hash->length) /* @@ -400,6 +404,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, cause = "missing-HMAC"; goto out; case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE: + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); fallthrough; case INTEGRITY_FAIL: /* Invalid HMAC/signature. */ cause = "invalid-HMAC"; @@ -444,9 +449,12 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } - /* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */ + /* + * Permit new files with file/EVM portable signatures, but + * without data. + */ if (inode->i_size == 0 && iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE && - xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) { + test_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags)) { status = INTEGRITY_PASS; }