Message ID | 20221109025019.1855-4-linux@weissschuh.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | certs: Prevent spurious errors on repeated blacklisting | expand |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 03:50:19AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > When the same key is blacklisted repeatedly we don't want to log an Who is "we"? > error. These duplicates can be provided by buggy firmware. Instead of > spamming the bootlog with errors we use a warning that can still be seen > by OEMs when testing. > > Also extend BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM as otherwise the EACCES will shadow the > EEXIST. How? I.e. please state how you extend it, and why new need the extra bits. > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8c65713-5cda-43ad-8018-20f2e32e4432@t-8ch.de/ > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104014704.3469-1-linux@weissschuh.net/ > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> > --- > certs/blacklist.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c > index 6e260c4b6a19..ac8e3166b6d7 100644 > --- a/certs/blacklist.c > +++ b/certs/blacklist.c > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > */ > #define MAX_HASH_LEN 128 > > -#define BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM (KEY_POS_SEARCH | KEY_POS_VIEW | \ > +#define BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM (KEY_POS_WRITE | KEY_POS_SEARCH | KEY_POS_VIEW | \ > KEY_USR_SEARCH | KEY_USR_VIEW) > > static const char tbs_prefix[] = "tbs"; > @@ -183,16 +183,19 @@ static int mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash) > { > key_ref_t key; > > - key = key_create_or_update(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true), > - "blacklist", > - hash, > - NULL, > - 0, > - BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM, > - KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | > - KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN); > + key = key_create(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true), > + "blacklist", > + hash, > + NULL, > + 0, > + BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM, > + KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | > + KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN); > if (IS_ERR(key)) { > - pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash %s: %pe\n", hash, key); > + if (PTR_ERR(key) == -EEXIST) > + pr_warn("Duplicate blacklisted hash %s\n", hash); > + else > + pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash %s: %pe\n", hash, key); > return PTR_ERR(key); > } > return 0; > -- > 2.38.1 > BR, Jarkko
diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c index 6e260c4b6a19..ac8e3166b6d7 100644 --- a/certs/blacklist.c +++ b/certs/blacklist.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ */ #define MAX_HASH_LEN 128 -#define BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM (KEY_POS_SEARCH | KEY_POS_VIEW | \ +#define BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM (KEY_POS_WRITE | KEY_POS_SEARCH | KEY_POS_VIEW | \ KEY_USR_SEARCH | KEY_USR_VIEW) static const char tbs_prefix[] = "tbs"; @@ -183,16 +183,19 @@ static int mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash) { key_ref_t key; - key = key_create_or_update(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true), - "blacklist", - hash, - NULL, - 0, - BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM, - KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | - KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN); + key = key_create(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true), + "blacklist", + hash, + NULL, + 0, + BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM, + KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | + KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN); if (IS_ERR(key)) { - pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash %s: %pe\n", hash, key); + if (PTR_ERR(key) == -EEXIST) + pr_warn("Duplicate blacklisted hash %s\n", hash); + else + pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash %s: %pe\n", hash, key); return PTR_ERR(key); } return 0;
When the same key is blacklisted repeatedly we don't want to log an error. These duplicates can be provided by buggy firmware. Instead of spamming the bootlog with errors we use a warning that can still be seen by OEMs when testing. Also extend BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM as otherwise the EACCES will shadow the EEXIST. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8c65713-5cda-43ad-8018-20f2e32e4432@t-8ch.de/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221104014704.3469-1-linux@weissschuh.net/ Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> --- certs/blacklist.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)