| Message ID | 20240524093015.2402952-6-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Socket type control for Landlock | expand |
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 05:30:08PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote: > Add test that validates behavior of landlock after rule with > unknown access is added. > > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> > --- > > Changes since v1: > * Refactors commit messsage. > --- > .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > index eb5d62263460..57d5927906b8 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > @@ -206,4 +206,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) > EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); > } > > +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) > +{ > + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { > + .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL, > + }; > + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { > + .family = self->srv0.protocol.family, > + .type = self->srv0.protocol.type, > + }; > + int ruleset_fd; > + __u64 access; > + > + ruleset_fd = > + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); > + > + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { > + protocol.allowed_access = access; > + EXPECT_EQ(-1, > + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, > + &protocol, 0)); > + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); > + } > + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); > +} > + > TEST_HARNESS_MAIN > -- > 2.34.1 > Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c index eb5d62263460..57d5927906b8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c @@ -206,4 +206,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { + .family = self->srv0.protocol.family, + .type = self->srv0.protocol.type, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + __u64 access; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { + protocol.allowed_access = access; + EXPECT_EQ(-1, + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, + &protocol, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
Add test that validates behavior of landlock after rule with unknown access is added. Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> --- Changes since v1: * Refactors commit messsage. --- .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)