From patchwork Fri May 24 09:30:08 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mikhail Ivanov X-Patchwork-Id: 13672956 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C3E85925; Fri, 24 May 2024 09:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716543067; cv=none; b=XSVi063cY5zu0RF+5d9ry8Qgintw4bgfgydDaJyFihCyHggu37SibaSd8QtDrpVI6dTj+iCFrgQFzuy0KPFKCkjx1sdbf33KeWlJca5sV9J4//vhPDk1akuGSa9XXqP0Wlrb3nvQzBLXjqL6Rh+QE1JCwA5T0hJvWNm0DZmZPXs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716543067; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nfospkBlIKZ8TZMuU2G4eh17Fe3mW1kHAuWIHtr3KVU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KfLeL19xsuHkmuHyaoIyTplQqZscBULExNpIadmxnTd5RySgV2dK6pRnCBTckDpHk4o4ckQ78p3o5aWMMG/DjRy77ssDWQDiaaYAZ0gWr/XuQGSfrz0IbqrkaEOBtB4DqZufH3zFwQO9AM/Hc3GFUWd20gN4BpILzfCMji9yBmk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Vm07D3nKvzsRhb; Fri, 24 May 2024 17:27:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.49]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C93B18007A; Fri, 24 May 2024 17:31:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from mscphis02103.huawei.com (10.123.65.215) by dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 24 May 2024 17:31:02 +0800 From: Mikhail Ivanov To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 05/12] selftests/landlock: Add protocol.rule_with_unknown_access to socket tests Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 17:30:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20240524093015.2402952-6-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240524093015.2402952-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> References: <20240524093015.2402952-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: mscpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.188.51.133) To dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) Add test that validates behavior of landlock after rule with unknown access is added. Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov Reviewed-by: Günther Noack --- Changes since v1: * Refactors commit messsage. --- .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c index eb5d62263460..57d5927906b8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c @@ -206,4 +206,30 @@ TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST_F(protocol, rule_with_unknown_access) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_socket = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol = { + .family = self->srv0.protocol.family, + .type = self->srv0.protocol.type, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + __u64 access; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + for (access = 1ULL << 63; access != ACCESS_LAST; access >>= 1) { + protocol.allowed_access = access; + EXPECT_EQ(-1, + landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, + &protocol, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST_HARNESS_MAIN