@@ -108,10 +108,11 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock)
struct inode *inode;
struct proc_inode *ei;
struct hlist_node *node;
- struct super_block *sb;
+ struct super_block *old_sb = NULL;
rcu_read_lock();
for (;;) {
+ struct super_block *sb;
node = hlist_first_rcu(inodes);
if (!node)
break;
@@ -122,23 +123,28 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock)
inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
sb = inode->i_sb;
- if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active))
+ if ((sb != old_sb) && !atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active))
continue;
inode = igrab(inode);
rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (sb != old_sb) {
+ if (old_sb)
+ deactivate_super(old_sb);
+ old_sb = sb;
+ }
if (unlikely(!inode)) {
- deactivate_super(sb);
rcu_read_lock();
continue;
}
d_prune_aliases(inode);
iput(inode);
- deactivate_super(sb);
rcu_read_lock();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (old_sb)
+ deactivate_super(old_sb);
}
static int proc_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
Because there are likely to be several sysctls in a row on the same superblock cache the super_block after the count has been raised and don't deactivate it until we are processing another super_block. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- fs/proc/inode.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)