diff mbox

[2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT

Message ID 20130201105849.GB21191@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Commit c58a1545e39ed1ff54dd2c167d3d25ae62c0dbd3
Headers show

Commit Message

Mark Rutland Feb. 1, 2013, 10:58 a.m. UTC 
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Hi Simon,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > This allows the GIC interrupt controller of the  r8a7779 SoC to be
> > > > initialised using a flattened device tree blob.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi               |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h |    1 +
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7779.c        |   27 +++++++++++++----
> > > >  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..eadc12e
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Device Tree Source for Renesas r8a7740
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Renesas Solutions Corp.
> > > > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Simon Horman
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> > > > + * version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any
> > > > + * kind, whether express or implied.
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
> > > > +
> > > > +/ {
> > > > +	compatible = "renesas,r8a7779";
> > > > +
> > > > +	cpus {
> > > > +		cpu@0 {
> > > > +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> > > > +		};
> > > > +		cpu@1 {
> > > > +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> > > > +		};
> > > > +		cpu@2 {
> > > > +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> > > > +		};
> > > > +		cpu@3 {
> > > > +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> > > > +		};
> > > > +	};
> > > 
> > > Sorry to sound like a broken record, but it'd be good to see reg and
> > > device_type set here.
> > 
> > Sure, will do.
> > 
> > > > +
> > > > +        gic: interrupt-controller@f0001000 {
> > > > +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> > > > +                #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > > > +                #address-cells = <1>;
> > > 
> > > Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the
> > > binding document example, but I can't figure out why.
> > 
> > Its here because I copied the example.
> > I will see about removing it from here.

Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've
missed?

The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be
some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic.

If this is superfluous, how about the patch below?

I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have
#address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These
should probably be cleaned up too.

[...]

Thanks,
Mark.

---->8----

From dc734edb8040513785429c11e40a420870dc55a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: gic: remove #address-cells from example

The gic has no child nodes, and so doesn't need #address-cells. Having
the property defined in the example only serves as a source of
confusion.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Rob Herring Feb. 1, 2013, 2:15 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>>> +
>>>>> +        gic: interrupt-controller@f0001000 {
>>>>> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
>>>>> +                #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>>>>> +                #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>
>>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the
>>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why.
>>>
>>> Its here because I copied the example.
>>> I will see about removing it from here.
> 
> Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've
> missed?
> 
> The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be
> some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic.

If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at
#address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map
though.
> 
> If this is superfluous, how about the patch below?

The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with
interrupt-map.

> 
> I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have
> #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These
> should probably be cleaned up too.

Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So
I'm inclined to leave things alone.

Rob

> 
> [...]
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> ---->8----
> 
> From dc734edb8040513785429c11e40a420870dc55a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Docs: gic: remove #address-cells from example
> 
> The gic has no child nodes, and so doesn't need #address-cells. Having
> the property defined in the example only serves as a source of
> confusion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> index 62eb8df..45b99ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ Example:
>  	intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
>  		compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
>  		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> -		#address-cells = <1>;
>  		interrupt-controller;
>  		reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
>  		      <0xfff10100 0x100>;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mark Rutland Feb. 4, 2013, 5:37 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:15:37PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>>> Hi Simon,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +        gic: interrupt-controller@f0001000 {
> >>>>> +                compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> >>>>> +                #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> >>>>> +                #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>>
> >>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the
> >>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why.
> >>>
> >>> Its here because I copied the example.
> >>> I will see about removing it from here.
> > 
> > Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've
> > missed?
> > 
> > The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be
> > some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic.
> 
> If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at
> #address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map
> though.

Aah. So this is some devicetree magic after all. Thanks for looking into it.

> > 
> > If this is superfluous, how about the patch below?
> 
> The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with
> interrupt-map.

That'd be nice. It might limit the confusion we had here.

> 
> > 
> > I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have
> > #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These
> > should probably be cleaned up too.
> 
> Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So
> I'm inclined to leave things alone.

That would make sense.

Thanks,
Mark.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
index 62eb8df..45b99ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@  Example:
 	intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
 		compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
 		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
-		#address-cells = <1>;
 		interrupt-controller;
 		reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
 		      <0xfff10100 0x100>;