Message ID | 20170616181059.19206-5-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c index c77a5aced81a..d48fd7c918f8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c @@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ dma_addr_t exynos_drm_fb_dma_addr(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, int index) { struct exynos_drm_fb *exynos_fb = to_exynos_fb(fb); - if (index >= MAX_FB_BUFFER) - return DMA_ERROR_CODE; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(index >= MAX_FB_BUFFER)) + return 0; return exynos_fb->dma_addr[index]; }
DMA_ERROR_CODE already isn't a valid API to user for drivers and will go away soon. exynos_drm_fb_dma_addr uses it a an error return when the passed in index is invalid, but the callers never check for it but instead pass the address straight to the hardware. Add a WARN_ON instead and just return 0. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)