Message ID | 20200728051153.1590-3-rppt@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | memblock: seasonal cleaning^w cleanup | expand |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:11:40AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > > The memory size calculation in cma_early_percent_memory() traverses > memblock.memory rather than simply call memblock_phys_mem_size(). The > comment in that function suggests that at some point there should have been > call to memblock_analyze() before memblock_phys_mem_size() could be used. > As of now, there is no memblock_analyze() at all and > memblock_phys_mem_size() can be used as soon as cold-plug memory is > registerd with memblock. > > Replace loop over memblock.memory with a call to memblock_phys_mem_size(). > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
diff --git a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c index 15bc5026c485..1992afd8ca7b 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c @@ -73,16 +73,7 @@ early_param("cma", early_cma); static phys_addr_t __init __maybe_unused cma_early_percent_memory(void) { - struct memblock_region *reg; - unsigned long total_pages = 0; - - /* - * We cannot use memblock_phys_mem_size() here, because - * memblock_analyze() has not been called yet. - */ - for_each_memblock(memory, reg) - total_pages += memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg) - - memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg); + unsigned long total_pages = PHYS_PFN(memblock_phys_mem_size()); return (total_pages * CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_PERCENTAGE / 100) << PAGE_SHIFT; }