Message ID | 20201129110803.2461700-1-daniel@0x0f.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add GPIO support for MStar/SigmaStar ARMv7 | expand |
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:08 PM Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> wrote: > At the moment the MStar/SigmaStar support is only really > capable of shell from an initramfs and not much else. > > Most of the interesting drivers are blocked on clock and pinctrl > drivers and those are going to take me a little while to get cleaned > up. > > Clock and pinctrl aren't needed for basic GPIO to work (all pins > start off as GPIOs..) and it makes it possible to actually do something > so this series adds everything that is needed for the main GPIO > block in these chips. > > Changes since v3: > - Remove unneeded "gpio-ranges-group-names" property from binding yaml. OK finished! Patches 1, 2 & 3 applied to the GPIO tree for v5.11. Thanks for the good work! Yours, Linus Walleij
Hi Linus, On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 06:43, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > OK finished! > Patches 1, 2 & 3 applied to the GPIO tree for v5.11. Awesome! Thank you Linus. :) Arnd and Olof: Sorry for being a noob.. Is there anything I need to do for patches 4 and 5 (device tree bits)? They are in the Linux SoC patchwork. Thanks, Daniel
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:55 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 06:43, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > OK finished! > > Patches 1, 2 & 3 applied to the GPIO tree for v5.11. > > Awesome! Thank you Linus. :) > > Arnd and Olof: Sorry for being a noob.. Is there anything I need to do > for patches 4 and 5 (device tree bits)? > They are in the Linux SoC patchwork. I've picked them up from there along with the second series of DT changes. The easiest way for me though is if you include the patches in a pull request or patch series that can go through the soc tree in one chunk. Arnd
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:07:57 +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > At the moment the MStar/SigmaStar support is only really > capable of shell from an initramfs and not much else. > > Most of the interesting drivers are blocked on clock and pinctrl > drivers and those are going to take me a little while to get cleaned > up. > > [...] Applied to arm/dt, thanks! [4/5] ARM: mstar: Add gpio controller to MStar base dtsi commit: 74530d645126c2934b16db135edaef16eff9e35b [5/5] ARM: mstar: Fill in GPIO controller properties for infinity commit: 5b8a05b9e8d10c8df29bb719e73ea8ed916a1eea Arnd
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:47 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:55 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 06:43, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > OK finished! > > > Patches 1, 2 & 3 applied to the GPIO tree for v5.11. > > > > Awesome! Thank you Linus. :) > > > > Arnd and Olof: Sorry for being a noob.. Is there anything I need to do > > for patches 4 and 5 (device tree bits)? > > They are in the Linux SoC patchwork. > > I've picked them up from there along with the second series of DT changes. And I made a mess, as I had not realized that the DT patches depend on the dt-binding header. I've applied that patch on top now to make my branch build cleanly again, even though it is not fully bisectable. Arnd