mbox series

[RESEND/PULL,0/2] MAINTAINERS updates for PolarFire SoC

Message ID 20220810140243.2685416-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series MAINTAINERS updates for PolarFire SoC | expand

Message

Conor Dooley Aug. 10, 2022, 2:02 p.m. UTC
Hey Arnd,

Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when
you get a chance?

The first is adding coverage for "my" dt-bindings as suggested by Mark.
I CCed all the subsystem maintainers on a V1 a week ago & I've added
them explicity to the patch text this time as CCs. Correct me if I am
wrong, but I am operating on the assumption that their Acks are not
required here. Hopefully increasing the binding coverage is non
controversial!

The second patch is a resend of a patch that was deferred to later in
the merge window avoid messing about with a 4th conflict in the entry.

Thanks,
Conor.

Conor Dooley (2):
  MAINTAINERS: add PolarFire SoC dt bindings
  MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver

 MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)


base-commit: 4e23eeebb2e57f5a28b36221aa776b5a1122dde5

Comments

patchwork-bot+linux-soc@kernel.org Aug. 10, 2022, 8:20 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This series was applied to soc/soc.git (arm/fixes)
by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:

On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:02:42 +0100 you wrote:
> Hey Arnd,
> 
> Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when
> you get a chance?
> 
> The first is adding coverage for "my" dt-bindings as suggested by Mark.
> I CCed all the subsystem maintainers on a V1 a week ago & I've added
> them explicity to the patch text this time as CCs. Correct me if I am
> wrong, but I am operating on the assumption that their Acks are not
> required here. Hopefully increasing the binding coverage is non
> controversial!
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [RESEND,1/2] MAINTAINERS: add PolarFire SoC dt bindings
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/fd7cb3e4684f
  - [RESEND,2/2] MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/3cbd67384677

You are awesome, thank you!
Palmer Dabbelt Aug. 26, 2022, 12:15 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:02:42 PDT (-0700), conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> Hey Arnd,
>
> Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when
> you get a chance?
>
> The first is adding coverage for "my" dt-bindings as suggested by Mark.
> I CCed all the subsystem maintainers on a V1 a week ago & I've added
> them explicity to the patch text this time as CCs. Correct me if I am
> wrong, but I am operating on the assumption that their Acks are not
> required here. Hopefully increasing the binding coverage is non
> controversial!
>
> The second patch is a resend of a patch that was deferred to later in
> the merge window avoid messing about with a 4th conflict in the entry.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
> Conor Dooley (2):
>   MAINTAINERS: add PolarFire SoC dt bindings
>   MAINTAINERS: add the Polarfire SoC's i2c driver
>
>  MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
>
> base-commit: 4e23eeebb2e57f5a28b36221aa776b5a1122dde5

Thanks, these are on fixes.
Conor Dooley Aug. 26, 2022, 6:22 a.m. UTC | #3
On 26/08/2022 01:15, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:02:42 PDT (-0700), conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> Hey Arnd,
>>
>> Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when
>> you get a chance?

> Thanks, these are on fixes.

I think these already were applied by Arnd. I guess the soc patchwork
bot does not CC the people on the original mail, only the author.
Palmer Dabbelt Aug. 26, 2022, 2:33 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:22:07 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 26/08/2022 01:15, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>> 
>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:02:42 PDT (-0700), conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>>> Hey Arnd,
>>>
>>> Could you please take the following two patches via the soc tree when
>>> you get a chance?
> 
>> Thanks, these are on fixes.
> 
> I think these already were applied by Arnd. I guess the soc patchwork
> bot does not CC the people on the original mail, only the author.

Ok, I've dropped them.  Thanks!