Message ID | 20241212155237.848336-1-kevin_chen@aspeedtech.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce ASPEED AST27XX BMC SoC | expand |
Hi Kevin, On Thu, 2024-12-12 at 23:52 +0800, Kevin Chen wrote: > --- > v3: > - Split clk and reset driver to other commits, which are in series > of > "Add support for AST2700 clk driver". > - For BMC console by UART12, add uart12 using ASPEED INTC > architecture. > > aspeed,ast2700-intc.yaml > - Add minItems to 1 to fix the warning by "make dtbs_check W=1". > - Add intc1 into example. > > Kconfig.platforms > - Remove MACH_ASPEED_G7. > > Kevin Chen (6): > dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Refine size/interrupt-cell > usage. > dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC > arm64: aspeed: Add support for ASPEED AST27XX BMC SoC > arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST27XX device tree > arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST2700 EVB device tree > arm64: defconfig: Add ASPEED AST2700 family support Do you mind sending a v4, because I received a confusing arrangement of patches: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Refine size/interrupt-cell usage. [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Fix the size-cells in ast2700-intc ... Where the content of [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC and [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC Differs, as does the content of [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Refine size/interrupt-cell usage. and [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Fix the size-cells in ast2700-intc Despite sounding like they might have the same intent Andrew
Hi, > > --- > > v3: > > - Split clk and reset driver to other commits, which are in series > > of > > "Add support for AST2700 clk driver". > > - For BMC console by UART12, add uart12 using ASPEED INTC > > architecture. > > > > aspeed,ast2700-intc.yaml > > - Add minItems to 1 to fix the warning by "make dtbs_check W=1". > > - Add intc1 into example. > > > > Kconfig.platforms > > - Remove MACH_ASPEED_G7. > > > > Kevin Chen (6): > > dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Refine size/interrupt-cell usage. > > dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC > > arm64: aspeed: Add support for ASPEED AST27XX BMC SoC > > arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST27XX device tree > > arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST2700 EVB device tree > > arm64: defconfig: Add ASPEED AST2700 family support > > Do you mind sending a v4, because I received a confusing arrangement of > patches: OK. I put a mixed commits in our send-mail server. I will try to send v4 patches. Thanks for your reminder. > > [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC [PATCH v3 > 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Refine size/interrupt-cell usage. > [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC [PATCH v3 > 2/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Fix the size-cells in ast2700-intc ... > > Where the content of > > [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC > > and > > [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add ASPEED AST27XX SoC > > Differs, as does the content of > > [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Refine size/interrupt-cell > usage. > > and > > [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Fix the size-cells in > ast2700-intc > > Despite sounding like they might have the same intent > > Andrew