diff mbox series

arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

Message ID 20220427114200.111904-1-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays | expand

Commit Message

Carsten Haitzler April 27, 2022, 11:42 a.m. UTC
Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann May 9, 2022, 2:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:42 PM <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>

I applied this patch on Apr 27 after you first sent it. There is normally an
automated confirmation email after it gets uploaded, but I think this did not
happen here because there was a small context mismatch -- the patch
still applied but patchwork did not detect it.

        Arnd
Carsten Haitzler May 10, 2022, 12:42 p.m. UTC | #2
On 5/9/22 15:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:42 PM <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
>> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
>> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
>> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> 
> I applied this patch on Apr 27 after you first sent it. There is normally an
> automated confirmation email after it gets uploaded, but I think this did not
> happen here because there was a small context mismatch -- the patch
> still applied but patchwork did not detect it.

Aaaah cool. Sorry - I was hunting it down in git trees and didn't find 
it... never mind the follow-on mails then. :)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@  CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@  CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y