diff mbox series

[v2,11/17] firmware: turris-mox-rwtm: Use dev_err_probe() where possible

Message ID 20240613161045.29606-12-kabel@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Updates for turris-mox-rwtm driver | expand

Commit Message

Marek Behún June 13, 2024, 4:10 p.m. UTC
Use dev_err_probe() where possible in the driver's .probe() method.

Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/turris-mox-rwtm.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko June 13, 2024, 8:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 6:11 PM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Use dev_err_probe() where possible in the driver's .probe() method.

...

>         rwtm->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&rwtm->mbox_client, 0);
>         if (IS_ERR(rwtm->mbox)) {
>                 ret = PTR_ERR(rwtm->mbox);
> -               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -                       dev_err(dev, "Cannot request mailbox channel: %i\n",
> -                               ret);
> -               return ret;

> +               if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +                       return ret;

What;s the point of this check, please?

> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> +                                    "Cannot request mailbox channel!\n");
>         }
Marek Behún June 17, 2024, 11:14 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:49:18 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 6:11 PM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Use dev_err_probe() where possible in the driver's .probe() method.  
> 
> ...
> 
> >         rwtm->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&rwtm->mbox_client, 0);
> >         if (IS_ERR(rwtm->mbox)) {
> >                 ret = PTR_ERR(rwtm->mbox);
> > -               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > -                       dev_err(dev, "Cannot request mailbox channel: %i\n",
> > -                               ret);
> > -               return ret;  
> 
> > +               if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +                       return ret;  
> 
> What;s the point of this check, please?
> 
> > +               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > +                                    "Cannot request mailbox channel!\n");
> >         }  
> 
> 

The point is to not print the error message if we just need to wait for
the mailbox driver.
Andy Shevchenko June 17, 2024, 12:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 1:14 PM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:49:18 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 6:11 PM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:

...

> > >         rwtm->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&rwtm->mbox_client, 0);
> > >         if (IS_ERR(rwtm->mbox)) {
> > >                 ret = PTR_ERR(rwtm->mbox);
> > > -               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > -                       dev_err(dev, "Cannot request mailbox channel: %i\n",
> > > -                               ret);
> > > -               return ret;
> >
> > > +               if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > +                       return ret;
> >
> > What;s the point of this check, please?
> >
> > > +               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > +                                    "Cannot request mailbox channel!\n");
> > >         }
>
> The point is to not print the error message if we just need to wait for
> the mailbox driver.

Right, but that was the initial idea behind dev_err_probe(). Have you
checked its implementation (and I hope it's documented as well)?
Marek Behún June 17, 2024, 1:04 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:26:00 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 1:14 PM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:49:18 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:  
> > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 6:11 PM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > > >         rwtm->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&rwtm->mbox_client, 0);
> > > >         if (IS_ERR(rwtm->mbox)) {
> > > >                 ret = PTR_ERR(rwtm->mbox);
> > > > -               if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > > -                       dev_err(dev, "Cannot request mailbox channel: %i\n",
> > > > -                               ret);
> > > > -               return ret;  
> > >  
> > > > +               if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > > +                       return ret;  
> > >
> > > What;s the point of this check, please?
> > >  
> > > > +               return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > > +                                    "Cannot request mailbox channel!\n");
> > > >         }  
> >
> > The point is to not print the error message if we just need to wait for
> > the mailbox driver.  
> 
> Right, but that was the initial idea behind dev_err_probe(). Have you
> checked its implementation (and I hope it's documented as well)?
> 

OK I am blushing now :-) Thanks, I'll drop the check
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/turris-mox-rwtm.c b/drivers/firmware/turris-mox-rwtm.c
index 3017a8c19005..81a82b1ef515 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/turris-mox-rwtm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/turris-mox-rwtm.c
@@ -461,10 +461,11 @@  static int turris_mox_rwtm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rwtm->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&rwtm->mbox_client, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(rwtm->mbox)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(rwtm->mbox);
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			dev_err(dev, "Cannot request mailbox channel: %i\n",
-				ret);
-		return ret;
+		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			return ret;
+
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
+				     "Cannot request mailbox channel!\n");
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, rwtm_devm_mbox_release, rwtm->mbox);
@@ -489,10 +490,8 @@  static int turris_mox_rwtm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rwtm->hwrng.priv = (unsigned long) rwtm;
 
 	ret = devm_hwrng_register(dev, &rwtm->hwrng);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Cannot register HWRNG: %i\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Cannot register HWRNG!\n");
 
 	rwtm_register_debugfs(rwtm);