| Message ID | 9b365e76-e346-f813-d750-d7cfd0d16e4e@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined, archived |
| Commit | 9c26abeb86ce6ab53b6397873bb3f556016c05ba |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 | expand |
Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Olof, > Hi ARnds, > > Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > > I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > same, I thought it is worth noting. I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might land on a commit before the merge). But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also builds. -Olof -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1255): https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/message/1255 Mute This Topic: https://linux.kernel.org/mt/69665798/1554929 Group Owner: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Unsubscribe: https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub [patchwork-linux-kernel-org@patchwork.kernel.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On 17/01/2020 20:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Olof, >> Hi ARnds, >> >> Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 >> >> I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged >> in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I >> double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the >> same, I thought it is worth noting. > > I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. > > Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need > them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are > bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might > land on a commit before the merge). No, it's the other way round. DRM relies on the four patches I took from Bibby Hsieh. They are part of v5.5-next/cmdq-stable and this branch was merged into v5.5-next/soc as well as in Ck Hu's DRM branch. My understanding is that Ck Hu sends pull requests to the DRM branch. > > But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There > are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch > when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also > builds. > The patches add some helper functions like cmdq_dev_get_client_reg on which the DRM branch from Ck Hu depends [1]. Hope that clarifies your questions. Regards, Matthias [1] https://github.com/ckhu-mediatek/linux.git-tags/commits/mediatek-drm-next-5.6 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1262): https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/message/1262 Mute This Topic: https://linux.kernel.org/mt/69665798/1554929 Group Owner: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Unsubscribe: https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub [patchwork-linux-kernel-org@patchwork.kernel.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:52 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 17/01/2020 20:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Olof, > >> Hi ARnds, > >> > >> Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > >> > >> I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > >> in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > >> double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > >> same, I thought it is worth noting. > > > > I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. > > > > Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need > > them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are > > bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might > > land on a commit before the merge). > > No, it's the other way round. DRM relies on the four patches I took from Bibby > Hsieh. They are part of v5.5-next/cmdq-stable and this branch was merged into > v5.5-next/soc as well as in Ck Hu's DRM branch. My understanding is that Ck Hu > sends pull requests to the DRM branch. Ah, ok -- in that case there's no need to bring in the DRM branch to your contents here, they'll merge them at their end. It doesn't do any harm (besides adding dependencies that aren't strictly needed), but we usually avoid doing it. > > But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There > > are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch > > when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also > > builds. > > > > The patches add some helper functions like cmdq_dev_get_client_reg on which the > DRM branch from Ck Hu depends [1]. > > Hope that clarifies your questions. Yeah, ok -- merging. -Olof -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1284): https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/message/1284 Mute This Topic: https://linux.kernel.org/mt/69665798/1554929 Group Owner: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Unsubscribe: https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub [patchwork-linux-kernel-org@patchwork.kernel.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello: This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/for-next). On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:17:58 +0100 you wrote: > Hi Olof, > Hi ARnds, > > Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > > I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > same, I thought it is worth noting. > > [...] Here is a summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/684415d0de3009cdc78dc0e8ab1b2bdcd919d834 You are awesome, thank you!
Hi Olof, Hi ARnds, Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the same, I thought it is worth noting. Regards, Matthias --- The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a: Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/ tags/v5.5-next-soc for you to fetch changes up to 9c26abeb86ce6ab53b6397873bb3f556016c05ba: Merge branch 'v5.5-next/cmdq-stable' into v5.5-next/soc (2020-01-10 11:00:45 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- cmdq: - clean ups of unused code and debuggability - add cmdq_instruction to make the function call interface more readable - add functions for polling and providing info for the user of cmdq scpsys: - add bindings for MT6765 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bibby Hsieh (4): soc: mediatek: cmdq: remove OR opertaion from err return soc: mediatek: cmdq: define the instruction struct soc: mediatek: cmdq: add polling function soc: mediatek: cmdq: add cmdq_dev_get_client_reg function Mars Cheng (1): dt-bindings: mediatek: add MT6765 power dt-bindings Matthias Brugger (2): soc: mediatek: cmdq: delete not used define Merge branch 'v5.5-next/cmdq-stable' into v5.5-next/soc .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/scpsys.txt | 6 + drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++---- include/dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h | 14 ++ include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 11 ++ include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 53 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1187): https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/message/1187 Mute This Topic: https://linux.kernel.org/mt/69665798/1554929 Group Owner: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Unsubscribe: https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub [patchwork-linux-kernel-org@patchwork.kernel.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-