new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#define alignof(X) __alignof__(X)
+#define __packed __attribute__((packed))
+
+struct sa {
+ int a:7;
+ int c:10;
+ int b:2;
+} __packed;
+_Static_assert(alignof(struct sa) == 1, "alignof(struct sa)");
+_Static_assert( sizeof(struct sa) == 3, "sizeof(struct sa)");
+
+
+static int get_size(void)
+{
+ return sizeof(struct sa);
+}
+
+static void chk_align(struct sa sa, struct sa *p)
+{
+ _Static_assert(alignof(sa) == 1, "alignof(sa)");
+ _Static_assert(alignof(*p) == 1, "alignof(*p)");
+}
+
+static int fp0(struct sa *sa)
+{
+ return sa->c;
+}
+
+static int fpx(struct sa *sa, int idx)
+{
+ return sa[idx].c;
+}
+
+static int fglobal(void)
+{
+ extern struct sa g;
+ return g.c;
+}
+
+static struct sa l;
+static int flocal(void)
+{
+ return l.c;
+}
+
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ extern void fun(struct sa *);
+ struct sa sa = { 0 };
+
+ fun(&sa);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: packed-bitfield0
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#define __packed __attribute__((packed))
+
+struct s {
+ unsigned int f0:1;
+ unsigned int f1:1;
+ unsigned int pad:6;
+} __packed;
+_Static_assert(sizeof(struct s) == 1, "sizeof(struct s)");
+
+extern struct s g;
+
+static int foo(struct s *ptr)
+{
+ int f = 0;
+
+ f += g.f0;
+ f += g.f1;
+
+ f += ptr->f0;
+ f += ptr->f1;
+
+ return f;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: packed-bitfield1
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+struct bf2 {
+ unsigned p1:2;
+ unsigned i1:32;
+ unsigned p2:2;
+ unsigned s9:9;
+ unsigned s9:9;
+ unsigned s9:9;
+ unsigned b1:1;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+_Static_assert(sizeof(struct bf2) == 8);
+
+/*
+ * check-name: packed-bitfield2
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+#define __packed __attribute__((packed))
+
+typedef unsigned char u8;
+typedef __UINT16_TYPE__ u16;
+typedef __UINT32_TYPE__ u32;
+typedef __UINT64_TYPE__ u64;
+
+struct b {
+ u32 a:1;
+ u32 b:2;
+ u32 c:4;
+ u32 d:8;
+ u32 e:16;
+} __packed;
+_Static_assert(__alignof(struct b) == 1);
+_Static_assert( sizeof(struct b) == 4);
+
+struct c {
+ u8 a;
+ u8 b;
+ u64 c:48;
+} __packed;
+_Static_assert(__alignof(struct c) == 1);
+_Static_assert( sizeof(struct c) == 8);
+
+/*
+ * check-name: packed-bitfield3
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#define __packed __attribute__((packed))
+
+typedef __UINT32_TYPE__ u32;
+
+struct s {
+ u32 f:24;
+} __packed;
+_Static_assert(sizeof(struct s) == 3);
+
+static int ld(struct s *s)
+{
+ return s->f;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: packed-bitfield4
+ * check-description: Is check_access() OK with short packed bitfields?
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#define __packed __attribute__((packed))
+
+typedef __UINT32_TYPE__ u32;
+
+struct s {
+ u32 a:5;
+ u32 f:30;
+ u32 z:5;
+} __packed;
+_Static_assert(sizeof(struct s) == 5);
+
+static int ld(struct s *s)
+{
+ return s->f;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: packed-bitfield5
+ * check-description: is check_access() OK with 'overlapping' packed bitfields?
+ * check-known-to-fail
+ */
Currently, packed bitfields are not handled correctly. Add some testcases for them. Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> --- validation/packed-bitfield0.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ validation/packed-bitfield1.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++ validation/packed-bitfield2.c | 16 ++++++++++ validation/packed-bitfield3.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++ validation/packed-bitfield4.c | 19 +++++++++++ validation/packed-bitfield5.c | 21 +++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 172 insertions(+) create mode 100644 validation/packed-bitfield0.c create mode 100644 validation/packed-bitfield1.c create mode 100644 validation/packed-bitfield2.c create mode 100644 validation/packed-bitfield3.c create mode 100644 validation/packed-bitfield4.c create mode 100644 validation/packed-bitfield5.c