Message ID | 20190828085746.26231-4-tz.stoyanov@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | trace-cmd: Timetamps sync between host and guest machines, relying on vsock events. | expand |
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:57:40 +0300 "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tstoyanov@vmware.com> > > The kbuffer_next_event() will return the next event on the sub buffer. > If we pass in the last_record to tracecmd_read_page_record(), it > initializes the sub buffer, and by calling kbuffer_next_event() > (instead of kbuffer_read_event()), the second event on the sub buffer > is returned. This causes the match of the last_record not to match if > the last_record happens to be the first event on the sub buffer. Bah, I see why this was done incorrectly. Good catch. This should be added independent of this series. Thanks! -- Steve
diff --git a/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c b/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c index 05e595f..3bb17f9 100644 --- a/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c +++ b/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c @@ -1720,18 +1720,22 @@ tracecmd_read_page_record(struct tep_handle *pevent, void *page, int size, goto out_free; } - do { + ptr = kbuffer_read_event(kbuf, &ts); + while (ptr < last_record->data) { ptr = kbuffer_next_event(kbuf, NULL); if (!ptr) break; - } while (ptr < last_record->data); + if (ptr == last_record->data) + break; + } if (ptr != last_record->data) { warning("tracecmd_read_page_record: could not find last_record"); goto out_free; } - } + ptr = kbuffer_next_event(kbuf, &ts); + } else + ptr = kbuffer_read_event(kbuf, &ts); - ptr = kbuffer_read_event(kbuf, &ts); if (!ptr) goto out_free;