Message ID | 20240131140955.3322792-1-vdonnefort@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 66bbea9ed6446b8471d365a22734dc00556c4785 |
Headers | show |
Series | ring-buffer: Clean ring_buffer_poll_wait() error return | expand |
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index 13aaf5e85b81..fd4bfe3ecf01 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, full = 0; } else { if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask)) - return -EINVAL; + return EPOLLERR; cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]; work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
The return type for ring_buffer_poll_wait() is __poll_t. This is behind the scenes an unsigned where we can set event bits. In case of a non-allocated CPU, we do return instead -EINVAL (0xffffffea). Lucky us, this ends up setting few error bits (EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP | EPOLLNVAL), so user-space at least is aware something went wrong. Nonetheless, this is an incorrect code. Replace that -EINVAL with a proper EPOLLERR to clean that output. As this doesn't change the behaviour, there's no need to treat this change as a bug fix. Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com> base-commit: 29142dc92c37d3259a33aef15b03e6ee25b0d188