Message ID | cover.1615171203.git.skhan@linuxfoundation.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | usbip fixes to crashes found by syzbot | expand |
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 08:53:25PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > This patch series fixes the following problems founds in syzbot > fuzzing. Thanks for these, all now queued up. greg k-h
On 2021/03/11 3:33, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 08:53:25PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >> This patch series fixes the following problems founds in syzbot >> fuzzing. > > Thanks for these, all now queued up. I send SIGSTOP to [PATCH 4/6] usbip: fix stub_dev usbip_sockfd_store() races leading to gpf [PATCH 5/6] usbip: fix vhci_hcd attach_store() races leading to gpf [PATCH 6/6] usbip: fix vudc usbip_sockfd_store races leading to gpf because these patches merely converted NULL pointer dererefence bug to use-after-free bug by breaking kthread_get_run() into kthread_create()/get_task_struct()/wake_up_process().
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:34:38PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/03/11 3:33, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 08:53:25PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> This patch series fixes the following problems founds in syzbot > >> fuzzing. > > > > Thanks for these, all now queued up. > > I send SIGSTOP to > > [PATCH 4/6] usbip: fix stub_dev usbip_sockfd_store() races leading to gpf > [PATCH 5/6] usbip: fix vhci_hcd attach_store() races leading to gpf > [PATCH 6/6] usbip: fix vudc usbip_sockfd_store races leading to gpf > > because these patches merely converted NULL pointer dererefence bug to use-after-free bug > by breaking kthread_get_run() into kthread_create()/get_task_struct()/wake_up_process(). I'll take follow-on patches to fix that other issue, if it's proven to be valid. It's nice to fix up NULL dereference issues as soon as possible :) thanks, greg k-h
On 2021/03/11 21:57, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:34:38PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> On 2021/03/11 3:33, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 08:53:25PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> This patch series fixes the following problems founds in syzbot >>>> fuzzing. >>> >>> Thanks for these, all now queued up. >> >> I send SIGSTOP to >> >> [PATCH 4/6] usbip: fix stub_dev usbip_sockfd_store() races leading to gpf >> [PATCH 5/6] usbip: fix vhci_hcd attach_store() races leading to gpf >> [PATCH 6/6] usbip: fix vudc usbip_sockfd_store races leading to gpf >> >> because these patches merely converted NULL pointer dererefence bug to use-after-free bug >> by breaking kthread_get_run() into kthread_create()/get_task_struct()/wake_up_process(). > > I'll take follow-on patches to fix that other issue, if it's proven to > be valid. It's nice to fix up NULL dereference issues as soon as > possible :) Not an "other issue". Shuah's [PATCH 4,5,6/6] is failing to fix NULL pointer dereference issue. These patches simply replaces NULL pointer dereference issue (caused by preemption) with use after free issue (caused by exactly same preemption) issue. Shuah has to understand the consequence of calling wake_up_process() on rx thread in order to fix this NULL pointer dereference issue. The only fix we can safely apply now is https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210205135707.4574-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp . Since I and Shuah agreed that we will remove kthread_get_run(), it is nice to fix up frequently happening -EINTR pointer dereference issue as soon as possible.
I cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux.git as you are testing changes there. > commit 09e4522c87ff54c655c09f318a68b012eda8eb01 (HEAD -> usbip_test, origin/usbip_test) > Author: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> > Date: Thu Mar 11 11:18:25 2021 -0700 > > usbip: fix vhci races in connection tear down > > - Change vhci_device_reset() to reset tcp_socket and sockfd. > if !in_disconnect How it can happen? vhci_device_reset() can be called only after vhci_shutdown_connection() completed, and vhci_shutdown_connection() from subsequent requests cannot be called until vhci_device_reset() completes. I consider it as a dead code which should be removed by my "[PATCH v4 05/12] usb: usbip: don't reset tcp_socket at vhci_device_reset()". And what you are missing in your [PATCH 4,5,6/6] is diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c index c4457026d5ad..3c64bd06ab53 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, /* end the lock */ wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ); // Consider being preempted here. wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); . wake_up_process(tcp_tx) can call vhci_shutdown_connection() before wake_up_process(tcp_tx) is called. Since vhci_shutdown_connection() destroys tcp_tx thread and releases tcp_tx memory via kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx), wake_up_process(tcp_tx) will access already freed memory. Your patch converted "NULL pointer dereference caused by failing to call kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx)" into "use after free caused by succeeding to call kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx)".
On 2021/03/12 14:44, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > And what you are missing in your [PATCH 4,5,6/6] is > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > index c4457026d5ad..3c64bd06ab53 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > /* end the lock */ > > wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ); // Consider being preempted here. > wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); > > rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); > > . wake_up_process(tcp_tx) can call vhci_shutdown_connection() before wake_up_process(tcp_tx) is called. wake_up_process(tcp_rx) can call vhci_shutdown_connection() before wake_up_process(tcp_tx) is called. > Since vhci_shutdown_connection() destroys tcp_tx thread and releases tcp_tx memory via kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx), > wake_up_process(tcp_tx) will access already freed memory. Your patch converted "NULL pointer dereference caused by > failing to call kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx)" into "use after free caused by succeeding to call kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx)". > And note that diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c index c4457026d5ad..0e1a81d4632c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c @@ -422,11 +422,11 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); /* end the lock */ - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); - rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); + return count; } static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(attach); is as well not sufficient, for you are still missing diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c index c4457026d5ad..c958f89a9196 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c @@ -422,11 +422,13 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); /* end the lock */ - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ); // Consider being preempted here. rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); + return count; } static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(attach); because vhci_port_disconnect() from detach_store() can call usbip_event_add(&vdev->ud, VDEV_EVENT_DOWN) (same use after free bug regarding tcp_tx and tcp_rx) as soon as all shared states are set up and spinlocks are released. What you had better consider first is how to protect event_handler()/usbip_sockfd_store()/attach_store()/detach_store() functions from concurrent calls. Please respond to https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3dab66dc-2981-bc88-a370-4b3178dfd390@i-love.sakura.ne.jp before you try to make further changes.
On 2021/03/13 9:48, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/03/12 14:44, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> And what you are missing in your [PATCH 4,5,6/6] is >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >> index c4457026d5ad..3c64bd06ab53 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >> @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, >> /* end the lock */ >> >> wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); >> + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ); // Consider being preempted here. >> wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); >> >> rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); >> >> . wake_up_process(tcp_tx) can call vhci_shutdown_connection() before wake_up_process(tcp_tx) is called. > > wake_up_process(tcp_rx) can call vhci_shutdown_connection() before wake_up_process(tcp_tx) is called. > >> Since vhci_shutdown_connection() destroys tcp_tx thread and releases tcp_tx memory via kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx), >> wake_up_process(tcp_tx) will access already freed memory. Your patch converted "NULL pointer dereference caused by >> failing to call kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx)" into "use after free caused by succeeding to call kthread_stop_put(tcp_tx)". >> > > And note that > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > index c4457026d5ad..0e1a81d4632c 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > @@ -422,11 +422,11 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); > /* end the lock */ > > - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); > - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); > - > rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); > > + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); > + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); > + > return count; > } > static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(attach); > > is as well not sufficient, for you are still missing Well, since tx thread can as well call usbip_event_add(USBIP_EH_SHUTDOWN), reversing the order of wake_up_process(tcp_tx) and wake_up_process(tcp_rx) will not help. > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > index c4457026d5ad..c958f89a9196 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > @@ -422,11 +422,13 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); > /* end the lock */ > > - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); > - wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ); // Consider being preempted here. > > rh_port_connect(vdev, speed); > > + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); > + wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); > + > return count; > } > static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(attach); > > because vhci_port_disconnect() from detach_store() can call usbip_event_add(&vdev->ud, VDEV_EVENT_DOWN) > (same use after free bug regarding tcp_tx and tcp_rx) as soon as all shared states are set up and > spinlocks are released. > > What you had better consider first is how to protect event_handler()/usbip_sockfd_store()/attach_store()/detach_store() functions > from concurrent calls. Please respond to https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3dab66dc-2981-bc88-a370-4b3178dfd390@i-love.sakura.ne.jp > before you try to make further changes. > After all, I believe that there is no choice but introduce a mutex for serialization. Greg, please pick up https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux.git/commit/?h=usbip_test&id=f345de0d2e51a20a2a1c30fc22fa1527670d2095 and below patch. From e0579aa776e4a3568c06f767c193d2204b64679d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 20:24:16 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v5] usb: usbip: serialize attach/detach operations The root problem syzbot has found [1] is that usbip module is not using serialization between attach/detach operations and event_handler(). This results in the following race windows. (1) two userspace processes can perform attach operation on the same device by writing the same content to the same attach interface file (2) one userspace process can perform detach operation on a device by writing to detach interface file while the other userspace process is performing attach operation on that device by writing to attach interface file (3) event_handler() kernel workqueue thread can perform detach operation on a device while some userspace process is still performing attach operation on that device What syzbot is reporting is (3), and what commits 46613c9dfa964c0c, 718ad9693e365612 and 9380afd6df70e24e did not take into account is As soon as one side of {tx,rx} kernel threads starts from attach operation, that kernel thread is allowed to call usbip_event_add(USBIP_EH_SHUTDOWN) which in turn allows event_handler() to call kthread_stop_put() on both {tx,rx} kernel threads via ud->eh_ops.shutdown(ud), before the other side of {tx,rx} kernel threads starts from attach operation. which will be reported as either NULL pointer dereference or use-after-free bug on the other side of {tx,rx} kernel threads. Since this race window cannot be closed without introducing serialization, this patch introduces usbip_event_mutex for serializing attach/detach operations and event_handler(). [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=95ce4b142579611ef0a9 Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+95ce4b142579611ef0a9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Fixes: 46613c9dfa964c0c ("usbip: fix vudc usbip_sockfd_store races leading to gpf") Fixes: 718ad9693e365612 ("usbip: fix vhci_hcd attach_store() races leading to gpf") Fixes: 9380afd6df70e24e ("usbip: fix stub_dev usbip_sockfd_store() races leading to gpf") --- drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_common.h | 2 ++ drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c index 8f1de1fbbeed..79ebc9795b4a 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(usbip_status); * is used to transfer usbip requests by kernel threads. -1 is a magic number * by which usbip connection is finished. */ -static ssize_t usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - const char *buf, size_t count) +static ssize_t __usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) { struct stub_device *sdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); int sockfd = 0; @@ -132,6 +132,17 @@ static ssize_t usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *a spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->ud.lock); return -EINVAL; } +static ssize_t usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) +{ + ssize_t ret = usbip_event_lock_killable(); + + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = __usbip_sockfd_store(dev, attr, buf, count); + usbip_event_unlock(); + return ret; +} static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(usbip_sockfd); static struct attribute *usbip_attrs[] = { diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_common.h b/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_common.h index d60ce17d3dd2..ad7de3773e06 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_common.h +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_common.h @@ -326,6 +326,8 @@ void usbip_stop_eh(struct usbip_device *ud); void usbip_event_add(struct usbip_device *ud, unsigned long event); int usbip_event_happened(struct usbip_device *ud); int usbip_in_eh(struct task_struct *task); +int usbip_event_lock_killable(void); +void usbip_event_unlock(void); static inline int interface_to_busnum(struct usb_interface *interface) { diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c index 5d88917c9631..e05b858f346d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c @@ -58,6 +58,19 @@ static struct usbip_device *get_event(void) } static struct task_struct *worker_context; +static DEFINE_MUTEX(usbip_event_mutex); + +int usbip_event_lock_killable(void) +{ + return mutex_lock_killable(&usbip_event_mutex); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usbip_event_lock_killable); + +void usbip_event_unlock(void) +{ + mutex_unlock(&usbip_event_mutex); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usbip_event_unlock); static void event_handler(struct work_struct *work) { @@ -68,6 +81,7 @@ static void event_handler(struct work_struct *work) } while ((ud = get_event()) != NULL) { + mutex_lock(&usbip_event_mutex); usbip_dbg_eh("pending event %lx\n", ud->event); /* @@ -91,6 +105,7 @@ static void event_handler(struct work_struct *work) unset_event(ud, USBIP_EH_UNUSABLE); } + mutex_unlock(&usbip_event_mutex); wake_up(&ud->eh_waitq); } } diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c index c4b4256e5dad..d06087e4e29b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c @@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ static int valid_port(__u32 *pdev_nr, __u32 *rhport) return 1; } -static ssize_t detach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - const char *buf, size_t count) +static ssize_t __detach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) { __u32 port = 0, pdev_nr = 0, rhport = 0; struct usb_hcd *hcd; @@ -263,6 +263,17 @@ static ssize_t detach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return count; } +static ssize_t detach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) +{ + ssize_t ret = usbip_event_lock_killable(); + + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = __detach_store(dev, attr, buf, count); + usbip_event_unlock(); + return ret; +} static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(detach); static int valid_args(__u32 *pdev_nr, __u32 *rhport, @@ -300,8 +311,8 @@ static int valid_args(__u32 *pdev_nr, __u32 *rhport, * * write() returns 0 on success, else negative errno. */ -static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - const char *buf, size_t count) +static ssize_t __attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) { struct socket *socket; int sockfd = 0; @@ -425,6 +436,17 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return count; } +static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, size_t count) +{ + ssize_t ret = usbip_event_lock_killable(); + + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = __attach_store(dev, attr, buf, count); + usbip_event_unlock(); + return ret; +} static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(attach); #define MAX_STATUS_NAME 16 diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c index a3ec39fc6177..3e3e4ef298d2 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c @@ -90,9 +90,8 @@ static ssize_t dev_desc_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, } static BIN_ATTR_RO(dev_desc, sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)); -static ssize_t usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, - struct device_attribute *attr, - const char *in, size_t count) +static ssize_t __usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *in, size_t count) { struct vudc *udc = (struct vudc *) dev_get_drvdata(dev); int rv; @@ -219,6 +218,17 @@ static ssize_t usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, return ret; } +static ssize_t usbip_sockfd_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *in, size_t count) +{ + ssize_t ret = usbip_event_lock_killable(); + + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = __usbip_sockfd_store(dev, attr, in, count); + usbip_event_unlock(); + return ret; +} static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(usbip_sockfd); static ssize_t usbip_status_show(struct device *dev,
Shuah, this driver is getting more and more cryptic and buggy. Please explain the strategy for serialization before you write patches. > - Fix attach_store() to check usbip_event_happened() before > waking up threads. No, this helps nothing. > diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > index c4b4256e5dad3..f0a770adebd97 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > @@ -418,6 +418,15 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); > /* end the lock */ > > + if (usbip_event_happened(&vdev->ud)) { > + /* > + * something went wrong - event handler shutting > + * the connection and doing reset - bail out > + */ > + dev_err(dev, "Event happended - handler is active\n"); > + return -EAGAIN; > + } > + detach_store() can queue shutdown event as soon as reaching "/* end the lock */" line but attach_store() might be preempted immediately after verifying that usbip_event_happened() was false (i.e. at this location) in order to wait for shutdown event posted by detach_store() to be processed. > wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_rx); > wake_up_process(vdev->ud.tcp_tx); >
On 3/17/21 12:21 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Shuah, this driver is getting more and more cryptic and buggy. > Please explain the strategy for serialization before you write patches. > >> - Fix attach_store() to check usbip_event_happened() before >> waking up threads. > > No, this helps nothing. > >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >> index c4b4256e5dad3..f0a770adebd97 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >> @@ -418,6 +418,15 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); >> /* end the lock */ >> >> + if (usbip_event_happened(&vdev->ud)) { >> + /* >> + * something went wrong - event handler shutting >> + * the connection and doing reset - bail out >> + */ >> + dev_err(dev, "Event happended - handler is active\n"); >> + return -EAGAIN; >> + } >> + > > detach_store() can queue shutdown event as soon as reaching "/* end the lock */" line > but attach_store() might be preempted immediately after verifying that > usbip_event_happened() was false (i.e. at this location) in order to wait for > shutdown event posted by detach_store() to be processed. > Yes. I haven't sent the patch for that reason. I am trying to test a solution. I haven't come up with a solution yet. Holding event_lock isn't the right solution. I am not going to accept that. This is a window that gets triggered by syzbot injecting errors in a sequence. Fixing this should be done taking other moving parts of the driver into account. thanks, -- Shuah
On 2021/03/18 0:06, Shuah Khan wrote: > Yes. I haven't sent the patch for that reason. I am trying to test a > solution. I haven't come up with a solution yet. > > Holding event_lock isn't the right solution. I am not going to accept > that. This is a window that gets triggered by syzbot injecting errors > in a sequence. Fixing this should be done taking other moving parts of > the driver into account. What is event_lock ? I questioned you what the event_lock is at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3dab66dc-2981-bc88-a370-4b3178dfd390@i-love.sakura.ne.jp , but you haven't responded to that post. Also, you need to send https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux.git/commit/?h=usbip_test&id=f345de0d2e51a20a2a1c30fc22fa1527670d2095 because Greg already sent this regression into upstream and stable kernels.
On 3/17/21 9:38 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/03/18 0:06, Shuah Khan wrote: >> Yes. I haven't sent the patch for that reason. I am trying to test a >> solution. I haven't come up with a solution yet. >> >> Holding event_lock isn't the right solution. I am not going to accept >> that. This is a window that gets triggered by syzbot injecting errors >> in a sequence. Fixing this should be done taking other moving parts of >> the driver into account. > > What is event_lock ? I questioned you what the event_lock is at > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3dab66dc-2981-bc88-a370-4b3178dfd390@i-love.sakura.ne.jp , > but you haven't responded to that post. > > Also, you need to send https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux.git/commit/?h=usbip_test&id=f345de0d2e51a20a2a1c30fc22fa1527670d2095 > because Greg already sent this regression into upstream and stable kernels. > I acked it when it came in and it will be picked up. thanks, -- Shuah
On 3/17/21 9:06 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 3/17/21 12:21 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> Shuah, this driver is getting more and more cryptic and buggy. >> Please explain the strategy for serialization before you write patches. >> >>> - Fix attach_store() to check usbip_event_happened() before >>> waking up threads. >> >> No, this helps nothing. >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >>> b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >>> index c4b4256e5dad3..f0a770adebd97 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c >>> @@ -418,6 +418,15 @@ static ssize_t attach_store(struct device *dev, >>> struct device_attribute *attr, >>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags); >>> /* end the lock */ >>> + if (usbip_event_happened(&vdev->ud)) { >>> + /* >>> + * something went wrong - event handler shutting >>> + * the connection and doing reset - bail out >>> + */ >>> + dev_err(dev, "Event happended - handler is active\n"); >>> + return -EAGAIN; >>> + } >>> + >> >> detach_store() can queue shutdown event as soon as reaching "/* end >> the lock */" line >> but attach_store() might be preempted immediately after verifying that >> usbip_event_happened() was false (i.e. at this location) in order to >> wait for >> shutdown event posted by detach_store() to be processed. >> > Please don't review code that isn't sent upstream. This repo you are looking at is a private branch created just to verify fixes on syzbot. I understand the race window you are talking about. I have my way of working to resolve it. thanks, -- Shuah
On 2021/03/18 22:13, Shuah Khan wrote: > Please don't review code that isn't sent upstream. This repo you are > looking at is a private branch created just to verify fixes on syzbot. But nobody was able to review this series when sent to ML (except you simply ignored my questions), and this series was merged to upstream and stable kernels despite there was an obvious assignment error which results in NULL pointer dereference. > > I understand the race window you are talking about. I have my way of > working to resolve it. Without an effort to share your understanding/idea and my understanding/idea, nobody can test/review what you call a solution.