diff mbox series

[1/7] power: supply: core: get rid of of_node

Message ID 20250225-psy-core-convert-to-fwnode-v1-1-d5e4369936bb@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series power: supply: core: convert to fwnode | expand

Commit Message

Sebastian Reichel Feb. 24, 2025, 11:21 p.m. UTC
This removes .of_node from 'struct power_supply', since there
is already a copy in .dev.of_node and there is no need to have
two copies.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 include/linux/power_supply.h             |  1 -
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Feb. 25, 2025, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #1
Il 25/02/25 00:21, Sebastian Reichel ha scritto:
> This removes .of_node from 'struct power_supply', since there
> is already a copy in .dev.of_node and there is no need to have
> two copies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Matti Vaittinen Feb. 25, 2025, 11:14 a.m. UTC | #2
On 25/02/2025 01:21, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> This removes .of_node from 'struct power_supply', since there
> is already a copy in .dev.of_node and there is no need to have
> two copies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> ---
>   drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>   include/linux/power_supply.h             |  1 -
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
> index d0bb52a7a0367a8e07787be211691cad14a41a54..11030035da6f121ca76bebf800c06cfd5db57578 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
> @@ -200,11 +200,11 @@ static int __power_supply_populate_supplied_from(struct power_supply *epsy,
>   	int i = 0;
>   
>   	do {
> -		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
> +		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
>   		if (!np)
>   			break;
>   
> -		if (np == epsy->of_node) {
> +		if (np == epsy->dev.of_node) {
>   			dev_dbg(&psy->dev, "%s: Found supply : %s\n",
>   				psy->desc->name, epsy->desc->name);
>   			psy->supplied_from[i-1] = (char *)epsy->desc->name;
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int  __power_supply_find_supply_from_node(struct power_supply *epsy,
>   	struct device_node *np = data;
>   
>   	/* returning non-zero breaks out of power_supply_for_each_psy loop */
> -	if (epsy->of_node == np)
> +	if (epsy->dev.of_node == np)
>   		return 1;
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -270,13 +270,13 @@ static int power_supply_check_supplies(struct power_supply *psy)
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	/* No device node found, nothing to do */
> -	if (!psy->of_node)
> +	if (!psy->dev.of_node)
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	do {
>   		int ret;
>   
> -		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
> +		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
>   		if (!np)
>   			break;
>   
> @@ -606,8 +606,8 @@ int power_supply_get_battery_info(struct power_supply *psy,
>   	const __be32 *list;
>   	u32 min_max[2];
>   
> -	if (psy->of_node) {
> -		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
> +	if (psy->dev.of_node) {
> +		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
>   		if (!battery_np)
>   			return -ENODEV;

This reminded me of a change I once did to power_supply - but maybe 
never got it further than RFC stage. Anyways, do you think it would be 
possible to decouple the battery info and struct power_suppply (while at 
it)?

I believe that the chargers and especially fuel-gauges which are 
designed to operate with different batteries (and which get battery 
details using static battery nodes), would like to get the battery info 
_before_ registering the power_supply (to avoid sending bogus values 
while operating on defaults, before the battery info is read and before 
things are set accordingly).

I know this may be a bit much to ask, but I believe it'd be an improvement.

Other than that, looks good to me.

>   
> @@ -1544,9 +1544,8 @@ __power_supply_register(struct device *parent,
>   	if (cfg) {
>   		dev->groups = cfg->attr_grp;
>   		psy->drv_data = cfg->drv_data;
> -		psy->of_node =
> +		dev->of_node =
>   			cfg->fwnode ? to_of_node(cfg->fwnode) : cfg->of_node;
> -		dev->of_node = psy->of_node;
>   		psy->supplied_to = cfg->supplied_to;
>   		psy->num_supplicants = cfg->num_supplicants;
>   	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/power_supply.h b/include/linux/power_supply.h
> index 6ed53b292162469d7b357734d5589bff18a201d0..975ccab56597ef579ef0c9dc913dcb0a26b5855a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/power_supply.h
> +++ b/include/linux/power_supply.h
> @@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ struct power_supply {
>   
>   	char **supplied_from;
>   	size_t num_supplies;
> -	struct device_node *of_node;
>   
>   	/* Driver private data */
>   	void *drv_data;
>
Sebastian Reichel Feb. 25, 2025, 1:11 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:14:03PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 25/02/2025 01:21, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > This removes .of_node from 'struct power_supply', since there
> > is already a copy in .dev.of_node and there is no need to have
> > two copies.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> >   include/linux/power_supply.h             |  1 -
> >   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
> > index d0bb52a7a0367a8e07787be211691cad14a41a54..11030035da6f121ca76bebf800c06cfd5db57578 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
> > @@ -200,11 +200,11 @@ static int __power_supply_populate_supplied_from(struct power_supply *epsy,
> >   	int i = 0;
> >   	do {
> > -		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
> > +		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
> >   		if (!np)
> >   			break;
> > -		if (np == epsy->of_node) {
> > +		if (np == epsy->dev.of_node) {
> >   			dev_dbg(&psy->dev, "%s: Found supply : %s\n",
> >   				psy->desc->name, epsy->desc->name);
> >   			psy->supplied_from[i-1] = (char *)epsy->desc->name;
> > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int  __power_supply_find_supply_from_node(struct power_supply *epsy,
> >   	struct device_node *np = data;
> >   	/* returning non-zero breaks out of power_supply_for_each_psy loop */
> > -	if (epsy->of_node == np)
> > +	if (epsy->dev.of_node == np)
> >   		return 1;
> >   	return 0;
> > @@ -270,13 +270,13 @@ static int power_supply_check_supplies(struct power_supply *psy)
> >   		return 0;
> >   	/* No device node found, nothing to do */
> > -	if (!psy->of_node)
> > +	if (!psy->dev.of_node)
> >   		return 0;
> >   	do {
> >   		int ret;
> > -		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
> > +		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
> >   		if (!np)
> >   			break;
> > @@ -606,8 +606,8 @@ int power_supply_get_battery_info(struct power_supply *psy,
> >   	const __be32 *list;
> >   	u32 min_max[2];
> > -	if (psy->of_node) {
> > -		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
> > +	if (psy->dev.of_node) {
> > +		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
> >   		if (!battery_np)
> >   			return -ENODEV;
> 
> This reminded me of a change I once did to power_supply - but maybe never
> got it further than RFC stage. Anyways, do you think it would be possible to
> decouple the battery info and struct power_suppply (while at it)?
>
> I believe that the chargers and especially fuel-gauges which are designed to
> operate with different batteries (and which get battery details using static
> battery nodes), would like to get the battery info _before_ registering the
> power_supply (to avoid sending bogus values while operating on defaults,
> before the battery info is read and before things are set accordingly).
> 
> I know this may be a bit much to ask, but I believe it'd be an improvement.
> 
> Other than that, looks good to me.

I was thinking about adding an init function to power_supply_desc,
which would be called directly before psy->initialized is set to
true in the power-supply registration phase. I think that would be
the right place to setup device registers based on battery-info data.
But it's definitely not a thing for this series.

Greetings,

-- Sebastian
Matti Vaittinen Feb. 25, 2025, 1:25 p.m. UTC | #4
On 25/02/2025 15:11, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:14:03PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>> On 25/02/2025 01:21, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>> This removes .of_node from 'struct power_supply', since there
>>> is already a copy in .dev.of_node and there is no need to have
>>> two copies.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>>>    include/linux/power_supply.h             |  1 -
>>>    2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
>>> index d0bb52a7a0367a8e07787be211691cad14a41a54..11030035da6f121ca76bebf800c06cfd5db57578 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
>>> @@ -200,11 +200,11 @@ static int __power_supply_populate_supplied_from(struct power_supply *epsy,
>>>    	int i = 0;
>>>    	do {
>>> -		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
>>> +		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
>>>    		if (!np)
>>>    			break;
>>> -		if (np == epsy->of_node) {
>>> +		if (np == epsy->dev.of_node) {
>>>    			dev_dbg(&psy->dev, "%s: Found supply : %s\n",
>>>    				psy->desc->name, epsy->desc->name);
>>>    			psy->supplied_from[i-1] = (char *)epsy->desc->name;
>>> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int  __power_supply_find_supply_from_node(struct power_supply *epsy,
>>>    	struct device_node *np = data;
>>>    	/* returning non-zero breaks out of power_supply_for_each_psy loop */
>>> -	if (epsy->of_node == np)
>>> +	if (epsy->dev.of_node == np)
>>>    		return 1;
>>>    	return 0;
>>> @@ -270,13 +270,13 @@ static int power_supply_check_supplies(struct power_supply *psy)
>>>    		return 0;
>>>    	/* No device node found, nothing to do */
>>> -	if (!psy->of_node)
>>> +	if (!psy->dev.of_node)
>>>    		return 0;
>>>    	do {
>>>    		int ret;
>>> -		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
>>> +		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
>>>    		if (!np)
>>>    			break;
>>> @@ -606,8 +606,8 @@ int power_supply_get_battery_info(struct power_supply *psy,
>>>    	const __be32 *list;
>>>    	u32 min_max[2];
>>> -	if (psy->of_node) {
>>> -		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
>>> +	if (psy->dev.of_node) {
>>> +		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
>>>    		if (!battery_np)
>>>    			return -ENODEV;
>>
>> This reminded me of a change I once did to power_supply - but maybe never
>> got it further than RFC stage. Anyways, do you think it would be possible to
>> decouple the battery info and struct power_suppply (while at it)?
>>
>> I believe that the chargers and especially fuel-gauges which are designed to
>> operate with different batteries (and which get battery details using static
>> battery nodes), would like to get the battery info _before_ registering the
>> power_supply (to avoid sending bogus values while operating on defaults,
>> before the battery info is read and before things are set accordingly).
>>
>> I know this may be a bit much to ask, but I believe it'd be an improvement.
>>
>> Other than that, looks good to me.
> 
> I was thinking about adding an init function to power_supply_desc,
> which would be called directly before psy->initialized is set to
> true in the power-supply registration phase. I think that would be
> the right place to setup device registers based on battery-info data.

Hm. I suppose that would work.

> But it's definitely not a thing for this series.

Fair enough. I thought that might be the case but decided to ask 
anyways, because, AFAIR there were no real problems what comes to not 
requiring the struct power_supply for reading the battery_info. But yes, 
I can see why killing the of_nodes is a big enough series, even without 
added complexity :)

Yours,
	-- Matti
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
index d0bb52a7a0367a8e07787be211691cad14a41a54..11030035da6f121ca76bebf800c06cfd5db57578 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
@@ -200,11 +200,11 @@  static int __power_supply_populate_supplied_from(struct power_supply *epsy,
 	int i = 0;
 
 	do {
-		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
+		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", i++);
 		if (!np)
 			break;
 
-		if (np == epsy->of_node) {
+		if (np == epsy->dev.of_node) {
 			dev_dbg(&psy->dev, "%s: Found supply : %s\n",
 				psy->desc->name, epsy->desc->name);
 			psy->supplied_from[i-1] = (char *)epsy->desc->name;
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@  static int  __power_supply_find_supply_from_node(struct power_supply *epsy,
 	struct device_node *np = data;
 
 	/* returning non-zero breaks out of power_supply_for_each_psy loop */
-	if (epsy->of_node == np)
+	if (epsy->dev.of_node == np)
 		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -270,13 +270,13 @@  static int power_supply_check_supplies(struct power_supply *psy)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* No device node found, nothing to do */
-	if (!psy->of_node)
+	if (!psy->dev.of_node)
 		return 0;
 
 	do {
 		int ret;
 
-		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
+		np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "power-supplies", cnt++);
 		if (!np)
 			break;
 
@@ -606,8 +606,8 @@  int power_supply_get_battery_info(struct power_supply *psy,
 	const __be32 *list;
 	u32 min_max[2];
 
-	if (psy->of_node) {
-		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
+	if (psy->dev.of_node) {
+		battery_np = of_parse_phandle(psy->dev.of_node, "monitored-battery", 0);
 		if (!battery_np)
 			return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -1544,9 +1544,8 @@  __power_supply_register(struct device *parent,
 	if (cfg) {
 		dev->groups = cfg->attr_grp;
 		psy->drv_data = cfg->drv_data;
-		psy->of_node =
+		dev->of_node =
 			cfg->fwnode ? to_of_node(cfg->fwnode) : cfg->of_node;
-		dev->of_node = psy->of_node;
 		psy->supplied_to = cfg->supplied_to;
 		psy->num_supplicants = cfg->num_supplicants;
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/power_supply.h b/include/linux/power_supply.h
index 6ed53b292162469d7b357734d5589bff18a201d0..975ccab56597ef579ef0c9dc913dcb0a26b5855a 100644
--- a/include/linux/power_supply.h
+++ b/include/linux/power_supply.h
@@ -316,7 +316,6 @@  struct power_supply {
 
 	char **supplied_from;
 	size_t num_supplies;
-	struct device_node *of_node;
 
 	/* Driver private data */
 	void *drv_data;