Message ID | cover.1728741827.git.repk@triplefau.lt (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improve ath10k flush queue mechanism | expand |
On 10/12/2024 7:13 AM, Remi Pommarel wrote: > It has been reported [0] that a 3-4 seconds (actually up to 5 sec) of > radio silence could be observed followed by the error below on ath10k > devices: > > ath10k_pci 0000:04:00.0: failed to flush transmit queue (skip 0 ar-state 1): 0 > > This is due to how the TX queues are flushed in ath10k. When a STA is > removed, mac80211 need to flush queues [1], but because ath10k does not > have a lightweight .flush_sta operation, ieee80211_flush_queues() is > called instead effectively blocking the whole queue during the drain > causing this radio silence. Also because ath10k_flush() waits for all > queued to be emptied, not only the flushed ones it could more easily > take up to 5 seconds to finish making the whole situation worst. > > The first patch of this series adds a .flush_sta operation to flush only > specific STA traffic avoiding the need to stop whole queues and should > be enough in itself to fix the reported issue. > > The second patch of this series is a proposal to improve ath10k_flush so > that it will be less likely to timeout waiting for non related queues to > drain. > > The abose kernel warning could still be observed (e.g. flushing a dead > STA) but should be now harmless. > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+Xfe4FjUmzM5mvPxGbpJsF3SvSdE5_wgxvgFJ0bsdrKODVXCQ@mail.gmail.com/ > [1]: commit 0b75a1b1e42e ("wifi: mac80211: flush queues on STA removal") > > Remi Pommarel (2): > wifi: ath10k: Implement ieee80211 flush_sta callback > wifi: ath10k: Flush only requested txq in ath10k_flush() > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 4 ++ > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt.h | 11 +++- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_tx.c | 50 +++++++++++++++- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 5 +- > 5 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > LGTM wit a few nits. Hope the Qualcomm ath10k folks review this. /jeff