@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int fdp_nci_patch_otp(struct nci_dev *ndev)
{
struct fdp_nci_info *info = nci_get_drvdata(ndev);
struct device *dev = &info->phy->i2c_dev->dev;
- u8 conn_id;
+ int conn_id;
int r = 0;
if (info->otp_version >= info->otp_patch_version)
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int fdp_nci_patch_ram(struct nci_dev *ndev)
{
struct fdp_nci_info *info = nci_get_drvdata(ndev);
struct device *dev = &info->phy->i2c_dev->dev;
- u8 conn_id;
+ int conn_id;
int r = 0;
if (info->ram_version >= info->ram_patch_version)
drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c: In function ‘fdp_nci_patch_otp’: drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c:372: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c: In function ‘fdp_nci_patch_ram’: drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c:443: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type fdp_nci_patch_otp() may return a negative error, which is silently ignored by assigning it to a u8. Change conn_id from u8 to int to fix this. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> --- fdp_nci_patch_otp() and fdp_nci_patch_ram() are almost identical. Please merge them, or create a common helper. --- drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)