Message ID | 1521899099-23634-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Samuel Ortiz |
Headers | show |
Hi Samuel, Maybe this patch series got forgotten? On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com> > > devm_kzalloc() may fail, so we should better check for error and > propagate the error in the case of allocation failure. > > This avoids a potential NULL pointer dereference later on. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c b/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c > index 4bed9e84..fd967a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c > +++ b/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c > @@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ int st21nfca_connectivity_event_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 host, > > transaction = (struct nfc_evt_transaction *)devm_kzalloc(dev, > skb->len - 2, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!transaction) > + return -ENOMEM; > > transaction->aid_len = skb->data[1]; > memcpy(transaction->aid, &skb->data[2], > -- > 2.7.4 >
Hi Fabio, On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:50:04AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > Maybe this patch series got forgotten? Both patches applied to nfc-next, sorry for the lag. Cheers, Samuel.
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c b/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c index 4bed9e84..fd967a3 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c @@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ int st21nfca_connectivity_event_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 host, transaction = (struct nfc_evt_transaction *)devm_kzalloc(dev, skb->len - 2, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!transaction) + return -ENOMEM; transaction->aid_len = skb->data[1]; memcpy(transaction->aid, &skb->data[2],