@@ -142,12 +142,10 @@ int cfg80211_dev_rename(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
if (result)
return result;
- if (rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir &&
- !debugfs_rename(rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir->d_parent,
- rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir,
- rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir->d_parent,
- newname))
- pr_err("failed to rename debugfs dir to %s!\n", newname);
+ if (rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir)
+ debugfs_rename(rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir->d_parent,
+ rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir,
+ rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir->d_parent, newname);
nl80211_notify_wiphy(rdev, NL80211_CMD_NEW_WIPHY);
@@ -886,11 +884,8 @@ int wiphy_register(struct wiphy *wiphy)
cfg80211_rdev_list_generation++;
/* add to debugfs */
- rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir =
- debugfs_create_dir(wiphy_name(&rdev->wiphy),
- ieee80211_debugfs_dir);
- if (IS_ERR(rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir))
- rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir = NULL;
+ rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir = debugfs_create_dir(wiphy_name(&rdev->wiphy),
+ ieee80211_debugfs_dir);
cfg80211_debugfs_rdev_add(rdev);
nl80211_notify_wiphy(rdev, NL80211_CMD_NEW_WIPHY);
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> --- net/wireless/core.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)