diff mbox series

[net-next] ath11k: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

Message ID 20200427092417.56236-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 69c93f9674c97dc439cdc0527811f8ad104c2e35
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show
Series [net-next] ath11k: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock | expand

Commit Message

Wei Yongjun April 27, 2020, 9:24 a.m. UTC
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.

Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo April 27, 2020, 9:38 a.m. UTC | #1
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> writes:

> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

Do note that ath11k patches go to my ath.git tree, not net-next. But no
need to resend because of this.
Kalle Valo April 28, 2020, 9:14 a.m. UTC | #2
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> wrote:

> A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.

69c93f9674c9 ath11k: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
index f74a0e74bf3e..34b1e8e6a7fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@  int ath11k_peer_rx_tid_setup(struct ath11k *ar, const u8 *peer_mac, int vdev_id,
 	else
 		hw_desc_sz = ath11k_hal_reo_qdesc_size(DP_BA_WIN_SZ_MAX, tid);
 
-	vaddr = kzalloc(hw_desc_sz + HAL_LINK_DESC_ALIGN - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+	vaddr = kzalloc(hw_desc_sz + HAL_LINK_DESC_ALIGN - 1, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!vaddr) {
 		spin_unlock_bh(&ab->base_lock);
 		return -ENOMEM;