From patchwork Thu May 11 16:03:10 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jakub Kicinski X-Patchwork-Id: 13238173 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C745C7EE22 for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 16:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238607AbjEKQDV (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2023 12:03:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53306 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232006AbjEKQDU (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2023 12:03:20 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B25859C6 for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236646152D for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 16:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07328C433EF; Thu, 11 May 2023 16:03:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1683820998; bh=M7ZEQZqgAAXcrxGaXk4Dj3qyK03hAF6XiCjUf0alVH4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=NkXhlUtpvEU2uBX0YrMaOddcB6CoWbKkd1rVoBGpfEdJ2wpvxU/f/83G4oNJH1ip/ sJDjUQYVp8B4a4DTU/MtsMW324Ymt81MSQHJYN9sJKaYZANsOgLlBlZ1cCc41QQoou lreFQQGzCLhMHe8988HUV7r7BdmvnQpcU7G6mRVJrA1hoPLaD71EU67cj1FPn6UbNc YA53XSYzolo6U2gebbdmn1HiqwVNpTc46hJE7PfhrkLpfTBPJJwJi7nxNr73EBswSb XX9lBWGmHDemFWeLfSKy38NYfjcz3V2avQuaeCxetHJfE2bo1mvQIShvTjMv6H0N/c VxE28HWWgcz1w== From: Jakub Kicinski To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, Jakub Kicinski , kvalo@kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: exclude wireless drivers from netdev Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 09:03:10 -0700 Message-Id: <20230511160310.979113-1-kuba@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org It seems that we mostly get netdev CCed on wireless patches which are written by people who don't know any better and CC everything that get_maintainers spits out. Rather than patches which indeed could benefit from general networking review. Marking them down in patchwork as Awaiting Upstream is a bit tedious. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Acked-by: Johannes Berg Acked-by: Kalle Valo --- CC: kvalo@kernel.org CC: johannes@sipsolutions.net CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Is this okay with everyone? It's not a big deal, but it really feels that for wireless we only get bot/autogenerated patches to netdev.. Here's the list of patches we marked as Awaiting Upstream: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?delegate=netdev¶m=-date&order=date&state=8 --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 58239fbc7007..4c49f4703a18 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -14565,6 +14565,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ F: drivers/connector/ F: drivers/net/ +X: drivers/net/wireless/ F: include/dt-bindings/net/ F: include/linux/etherdevice.h F: include/linux/fcdevice.h