[08/18] wifi: iwlwifi: keep BHs disabled when TXing from reclaim

Commit Message

Korenblit, Miriam Rachel July 3, 2024, 9:58 a.m. UTC

From: Benjamin Berg <[e-mail]>

During reclaim, we may release the txq->lock spinlock in order to call
iwl_trans_tx to queue new frames. The iwl_trans_tx function expects to
be called with BHs disabled and iwl_pcie_reclaim is most of the times
called with BHs disabled already. However, reclaim can also happen after
flushing a STA and in that case BHs will not be disabled.

Solve this corner case by only releasing the spinlock but keeping BHs
disabled.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c
index 8afb5fc1972e..1f6db6b90f6f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c
@@ -2412,7 +2412,7 @@  void iwl_pcie_reclaim(struct iwl_trans *trans, int txq_id, int ssn,
 		 * have tx as well. Bottom line, we can unlock and re-lock
 		 * later.
 		 */
-		spin_unlock_bh(&txq->lock);
+		spin_unlock(&txq->lock);
 
 		while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&overflow_skbs))) {
 			struct iwl_device_tx_cmd *dev_cmd_ptr;
@@ -2431,7 +2431,7 @@  void iwl_pcie_reclaim(struct iwl_trans *trans, int txq_id, int ssn,
 		if (iwl_txq_space(trans, txq) > txq->low_mark)
 			iwl_trans_pcie_wake_queue(trans, txq);
 
-		spin_lock_bh(&txq->lock);
+		spin_lock(&txq->lock);
 		txq->overflow_tx = false;
 	}