@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
* to handle wireless statistics.
*
* The initial APIs served us well and has proven a reasonably good design.
- * However, there is a few shortcommings :
+ * However, there are a few shortcomings :
* o No events, everything is a request to the driver.
* o Large ioctl function in driver with gigantic switch statement
* (i.e. spaghetti code).
@@ -38,13 +38,13 @@
* -------------------------------
* The new driver API is just a bunch of standard functions (handlers),
* each handling a specific Wireless Extension. The driver just export
- * the list of handler it supports, and those will be called apropriately.
+ * the list of handler it supports, and those will be called appropriately.
*
* I tried to keep the main advantage of the previous API (simplicity,
* efficiency and light weight), and also I provide a good dose of backward
* compatibility (most structures are the same, driver can use both API
* simultaneously, ...).
- * Hopefully, I've also addressed the shortcomming of the initial API.
+ * Hopefully, I've also addressed the shortcoming of the initial API.
*
* The advantage of the new API are :
* o Handling of Extensions in driver broken in small contained functions
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
/* ---------------------- THE IMPLEMENTATION ---------------------- */
/*
- * Some of the choice I've made are pretty controversials. Defining an
+ * Some of the choice I've made are pretty controversial. Defining an
* API is very much weighting compromises. This goes into some of the
* details and the thinking behind the implementation.
*
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
* example to distinguish setting max rate and basic rate), I would
* break the prototype. Using iwreq_data is more flexible.
* 3) Also, the above form is not generic (see above).
- * 4) I don't expect driver developper using the wrong field of the
+ * 4) I don't expect driver developer using the wrong field of the
* union (Doh !), so static typechecking doesn't add much value.
* 5) Lastly, you can skip the union by doing :
* static int mydriver_ioctl_setrate(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int iw_handler_get_thrspy(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
void wireless_spy_update(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *address,
struct iw_quality *wstats);
-/************************* INLINE FUNTIONS *************************/
+/************************* INLINE FUNCTIONS *************************/
/*
* Function that are so simple that it's more efficient inlining them
*/
Correct spelling in iw_handler.h. As reported by codespell. Also, while the "few shortcomings" line is being updated, correct it's grammar. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> --- Changes in v2: - Also correct grammar of "few shortcomings" line (Johannes) - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829-wifi-spell-v1-1-e0a8855482a9@kernel.org --- include/net/iw_handler.h | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)