Message ID | 20240924102345.811-3-quic_kangyang@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | wifi: ath11k: fix full monitor mode for QCN9074 | expand |
On 9/24/2024 3:23 AM, Kang Yang wrote: > ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng->lock to protect srng data. > > For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(), > they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng->lock. > > So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occurr: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'occurr' may be misspelled - perhaps 'occur'? > RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] > Call Trace: WARNING:MISSING_FIXES_TAG: The commit message has 'Call Trace:', perhaps it also needs a 'Fixes:' tag? > ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] > ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k] > ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0 > ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k] > ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k] > ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k] > __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0 > net_rx_action+0x198/0x320 > __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319 > > So add srng->lock for them to avoid such warnings. > > Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30 > Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 should be blank line here since the Tested-on tags are ath-specific and not "official" kernel.org tags > Signed-off-by: Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c > index 072963d3396c..5fd681b5df2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c > @@ -5146,7 +5146,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, > struct ath11k_mon_data *pmon = (struct ath11k_mon_data *)&dp->mon_data; > const struct ath11k_hw_hal_params *hal_params; > void *ring_entry; > - void *mon_dst_srng; > + struct hal_srng *mon_dst_srng; > u32 ppdu_id; > u32 rx_bufs_used; > u32 ring_id; > @@ -5163,6 +5163,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, > > spin_lock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); > > + spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); > ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); > > ppdu_id = pmon->mon_ppdu_info.ppdu_id; > @@ -5221,6 +5222,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, > mon_dst_srng); > } > ath11k_hal_srng_access_end(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); > + spin_unlock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); > > spin_unlock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); > > @@ -5607,7 +5609,7 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, > struct hal_sw_mon_ring_entries *sw_mon_entries; > struct ath11k_pdev_mon_stats *rx_mon_stats; > struct sk_buff *head_msdu, *tail_msdu; > - void *mon_dst_srng = &ar->ab->hal.srng_list[dp->rxdma_mon_dst_ring.ring_id]; > + struct hal_srng *mon_dst_srng; > void *ring_entry; > u32 rx_bufs_used = 0, mpdu_rx_bufs_used; > int quota = 0, ret; > @@ -5623,6 +5625,9 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, > goto reap_status_ring; > } > > + mon_dst_srng = &ar->ab->hal.srng_list[dp->rxdma_mon_dst_ring.ring_id]; > + spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); > + > ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); > while ((ring_entry = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng))) { > head_msdu = NULL; > @@ -5666,6 +5671,7 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, > } > > ath11k_hal_srng_access_end(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); > + spin_unlock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); > spin_unlock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); > > if (rx_bufs_used) { actual patch LGTM
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c index 072963d3396c..5fd681b5df2e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c @@ -5146,7 +5146,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, struct ath11k_mon_data *pmon = (struct ath11k_mon_data *)&dp->mon_data; const struct ath11k_hw_hal_params *hal_params; void *ring_entry; - void *mon_dst_srng; + struct hal_srng *mon_dst_srng; u32 ppdu_id; u32 rx_bufs_used; u32 ring_id; @@ -5163,6 +5163,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, spin_lock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); ppdu_id = pmon->mon_ppdu_info.ppdu_id; @@ -5221,6 +5222,7 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id, mon_dst_srng); } ath11k_hal_srng_access_end(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); + spin_unlock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); spin_unlock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); @@ -5607,7 +5609,7 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, struct hal_sw_mon_ring_entries *sw_mon_entries; struct ath11k_pdev_mon_stats *rx_mon_stats; struct sk_buff *head_msdu, *tail_msdu; - void *mon_dst_srng = &ar->ab->hal.srng_list[dp->rxdma_mon_dst_ring.ring_id]; + struct hal_srng *mon_dst_srng; void *ring_entry; u32 rx_bufs_used = 0, mpdu_rx_bufs_used; int quota = 0, ret; @@ -5623,6 +5625,9 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, goto reap_status_ring; } + mon_dst_srng = &ar->ab->hal.srng_list[dp->rxdma_mon_dst_ring.ring_id]; + spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); + ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); while ((ring_entry = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng))) { head_msdu = NULL; @@ -5666,6 +5671,7 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, } ath11k_hal_srng_access_end(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng); + spin_unlock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock); spin_unlock_bh(&pmon->mon_lock); if (rx_bufs_used) {
ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng->lock to protect srng data. For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(), they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng->lock. So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occurr: RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] Call Trace: ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k] ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k] ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k] ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k] __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319 So add srng->lock for them to avoid such warnings. Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30 Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Signed-off-by: Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)