diff mbox series

[v3,18/19] livepatch: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()

Message ID 20241210-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v3-18-ddfefd7e9f2a@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Johannes Berg
Headers show
Series Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() | expand

Commit Message

Easwar Hariharan Dec. 10, 2024, 10:02 p.m. UTC
Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.

This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following Coccinelle rules:

@@ constant C; @@

- msecs_to_jiffies(C * 1000)
+ secs_to_jiffies(C)

@@ constant C; @@

- msecs_to_jiffies(C * MSEC_PER_SEC)
+ secs_to_jiffies(C)

Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c |  3 +--
 samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c       |  3 +--
 samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c        | 15 +++++----------
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Christophe Leroy Dec. 11, 2024, 7 a.m. UTC | #1
Le 10/12/2024 à 23:02, Easwar Hariharan a écrit :
> Commit b35108a51cf7 ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
> secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
> secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
> 
> This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
> the following Coccinelle rules:
> 
> @@ constant C; @@
> 
> - msecs_to_jiffies(C * 1000)
> + secs_to_jiffies(C)
> 
> @@ constant C; @@
> 
> - msecs_to_jiffies(C * MSEC_PER_SEC)
> + secs_to_jiffies(C)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>   samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c |  3 +--
>   samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c       |  3 +--
>   samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c        | 15 +++++----------
>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
> index 378e2d40271a9717d09eff51d3d3612c679736fc..69105596e72e6826aa2815cb2599eea56a0055ba 100644
> --- a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
> +++ b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
> @@ -44,8 +44,7 @@ static void busymod_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>   static int livepatch_callbacks_mod_init(void)
>   {
>   	pr_info("%s\n", __func__);
> -	schedule_delayed_work(&work,
> -		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * 0));
> +	schedule_delayed_work(&work, 0);

This hunk is not in line with the patch description.

This is probably OK to have in this patch, but you should add additional 
description to mention that special case with a 0 delay.

Allthough you should probably change it to schedule_work() instead of 
using a 0 delay.

Christophe
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
index 378e2d40271a9717d09eff51d3d3612c679736fc..69105596e72e6826aa2815cb2599eea56a0055ba 100644
--- a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
+++ b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
@@ -44,8 +44,7 @@  static void busymod_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
 static int livepatch_callbacks_mod_init(void)
 {
 	pr_info("%s\n", __func__);
-	schedule_delayed_work(&work,
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * 0));
+	schedule_delayed_work(&work, 0);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c
index 6701641bf12d454a770e49abeeb0dea92560e55e..f3f153895d6ce751fc91ae1224d91b220cba3e37 100644
--- a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c
+++ b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c
@@ -72,8 +72,7 @@  static struct dummy *livepatch_fix1_dummy_alloc(void)
 	if (!d)
 		return NULL;
 
-	d->jiffies_expire = jiffies +
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * EXPIRE_PERIOD);
+	d->jiffies_expire = jiffies + secs_to_jiffies(EXPIRE_PERIOD);
 
 	/*
 	 * Patch: save the extra memory location into a SV_LEAK shadow
diff --git a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c
index 7e753b0d2fa611524c9e2adbe02c8fa3e9b6015e..5d83ad5a8118dbbac897dfcbb92e6d5f399d1dc3 100644
--- a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c
+++ b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c
@@ -101,8 +101,7 @@  static __used noinline struct dummy *dummy_alloc(void)
 	if (!d)
 		return NULL;
 
-	d->jiffies_expire = jiffies +
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * EXPIRE_PERIOD);
+	d->jiffies_expire = jiffies + secs_to_jiffies(EXPIRE_PERIOD);
 
 	/* Oops, forgot to save leak! */
 	leak = kzalloc(sizeof(*leak), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -152,8 +151,7 @@  static void alloc_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
 	list_add(&d->list, &dummy_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&dummy_list_mutex);
 
-	schedule_delayed_work(&alloc_dwork,
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * ALLOC_PERIOD));
+	schedule_delayed_work(&alloc_dwork, secs_to_jiffies(ALLOC_PERIOD));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -184,16 +182,13 @@  static void cleanup_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&dummy_list_mutex);
 
-	schedule_delayed_work(&cleanup_dwork,
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * CLEANUP_PERIOD));
+	schedule_delayed_work(&cleanup_dwork, secs_to_jiffies(CLEANUP_PERIOD));
 }
 
 static int livepatch_shadow_mod_init(void)
 {
-	schedule_delayed_work(&alloc_dwork,
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * ALLOC_PERIOD));
-	schedule_delayed_work(&cleanup_dwork,
-		msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * CLEANUP_PERIOD));
+	schedule_delayed_work(&alloc_dwork, secs_to_jiffies(ALLOC_PERIOD));
+	schedule_delayed_work(&cleanup_dwork, secs_to_jiffies(CLEANUP_PERIOD));
 
 	return 0;
 }