| Message ID | 20250218025957.13818-1-pkshih@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Chen-Yu Tsai |
| Headers | show |
| Series | wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Iran (IR) on both 2.4 and 5Ghz for 2019 | expand |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:00 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > > Decision No. 4004-01DEC-CRA, 8th Edition - February 2019, > Radiocommunications and Regulatory Organization. > General radio license for the use of parts of the frequency bands > 2400-2483.5 MHz, 5150-5250 MHz, 5350-5250 MHz, 5470-5725 MHz, and > 5850-5725 MHz in radio access networks. [1] > > * 2400 - 2483.5 > - 100 mW e.i.r.p > - 10dBm in every 1Mhz Should keep a note saying for outdoor only usage, the limit is 4000 mW. > * 5150 - 5250 > - 200 mW e.i.r.p > - 10dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth or -6dBm/25kHz per 25kHz bandwidth > * 5250 - 5350 > - 200 mW e.i.r.p > - 10dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth > - DFS For outdoor only usage, the limit is 1000 mW. Also, for outdoor usage, TPC is required, and there is no provision for 3 dB power reduction if TPC is not implemented. So I would mark this band as indoor only for now. > * 5470 - 5725 > - 1000 mW e.i.r.p > - 17dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth > - DFS > - If TPC is not used, the maximum radiated e.i.r.p. must be reduced > by 3dB. > - Outdoor use only > (Since NO-INDOOR flag is not supported by current format, don't add > this entry.) There are NO-INDOOR and NO-OUTDOOR flags for the database. The kernel doesn't have a matching IEEE80211_CHAN_OUTDOOR_ONLY flag though. Maybe that should be added? Johannes, what do you think? > * 5725 - 5850 > - 4000 mW e.i.r.p > - 36dBm in every 500 kHz > - DFS > - Outdoor use only > (Since NO-INDOOR flag is not supported by current format, don't add > this entry.) This band is point to point only. TPC is required without provision for no TPC. > These information is from [4], Mobin Aydinfar shared the official link [1] > (inaccessible from outside of Iran), a mirror version [2] and translated > version [3]. > > [1] https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 > [2] https://mobintestserver.ir/Iran-2.4Ghz-5Ghz-cra-official-doc.pdf > [3] https://mobintestserver.ir/Iran-2.4Ghz-5Ghz-cra-official-table.ods > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c9ccf5ba-c091-45c4-9283-970bfa4f1afe@mobintestserver.ir/T/#u > > Cc: Mobin Aydinfar <mobin@mobintestserver.ir> Please use "Reported-by" instead, and also add Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c9ccf5ba-c091-45c4-9283-970bfa4f1afe@mobintestserver.ir/T/#u Thanks ChenYu > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > --- > db.txt | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > index d56ad32d31c9..0189355dff17 100644 > --- a/db.txt > +++ b/db.txt > @@ -934,9 +934,12 @@ country IN: > (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (24), DFS > (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (30) > > -country IR: DFS-JP > - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > - (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) > +# Source: > +# https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 > +country IR: DFS-ETSI > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW) > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (200 mW), DFS > > # IS as part of CEPT accepted decisions 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 893) > # and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 440) > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 13:29 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > There are NO-INDOOR and NO-OUTDOOR flags for the database. The kernel > doesn't have a matching IEEE80211_CHAN_OUTDOOR_ONLY flag though. > Maybe that should be added? > > Johannes, what do you think? Good question. I guess we could have it, though I'm not sure we'd have any mechanics to actually _use_ such a thing right now? Something, say hostapd (?) would have to promise it's actually outdoors? More information doesn't hurt and I don't mind adding it at all, but I do think we'd probably not be able to use it at this time. Or we could add it to the db.txt file but ignore it in parsing now and skip the band for the binary for now? The thing is I don't think we have a good way to say "older kernel skips this range" - or perhaps we set the NO_IR flag so older kernel cannot use it but then allow OUTDOOR_ONLY to override that given some conditions? johannes
۱۸ فوریه ۲۰۲۵ ۰۶:۳۰:۳۸ Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@gmail.com>: > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > > Decision No. 4004-01DEC-CRA, 8th Edition - February 2019, > Radiocommunications and Regulatory Organization. > General radio license for the use of parts of the frequency bands > 2400-2483.5 MHz, 5150-5250 MHz, 5350-5250 MHz, 5470-5725 MHz, and > 5850-5725 MHz in radio access networks. [1] > > * 2400 - 2483.5 > - 100 mW e.i.r.p > - 10dBm in every 1Mhz > * 5150 - 5250 > - 200 mW e.i.r.p > - 10dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth or -6dBm/25kHz per 25kHz bandwidth > * 5250 - 5350 > - 200 mW e.i.r.p > - 10dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth > - DFS > * 5470 - 5725 > - 1000 mW e.i.r.p > - 17dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth > - DFS > - If TPC is not used, the maximum radiated e.i.r.p. must be reduced > by 3dB. > - Outdoor use only > (Since NO-INDOOR flag is not supported by current format, don't add > this entry.) > * 5725 - 5850 > - 4000 mW e.i.r.p > - 36dBm in every 500 kHz > - DFS > - Outdoor use only > (Since NO-INDOOR flag is not supported by current format, don't add > this entry.) > > These information is from [4], Mobin Aydinfar shared the official link > [1] > (inaccessible from outside of Iran), a mirror version [2] and > translated > version [3]. > > [1] > https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 > [2] https://mobintestserver.ir/Iran-2.4Ghz-5Ghz-cra-official-doc.pdf > [3] https://mobintestserver.ir/Iran-2.4Ghz-5Ghz-cra-official-table.ods > [4] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c9ccf5ba-c091-45c4-9283-970bfa4f1afe@mobintestserver.ir/T/#u > > Cc: Mobin Aydinfar <mobin@mobintestserver.ir> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > --- > db.txt | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > index d56ad32d31c9..0189355dff17 100644 > --- a/db.txt > +++ b/db.txt > @@ -934,9 +934,12 @@ country IN: > (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (24), DFS > (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (30) > > -country IR: DFS-JP > - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > - (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) > +# Source: > +# > https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 > +country IR: DFS-ETSI > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW) > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (200 mW), DFS > > # IS as part of CEPT accepted decisions 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 > 893) > # and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 > 440) > -- > 2.25.1 Thanks for the patch, I should mention the document date is February 2021, Not 2019. Best Regards
Mobin Aydinfar <mobin@mobintestserver.ir> wrote: > > ۱۸ فوریه ۲۰۲۵ ۰۶:۳۰:۳۸ Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@gmail.com>: > > > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > > > > Decision No. 4004-01DEC-CRA, 8th Edition - February 2019, > > Radiocommunications and Regulatory Organization. > > General radio license for the use of parts of the frequency bands > > 2400-2483.5 MHz, 5150-5250 MHz, 5350-5250 MHz, 5470-5725 MHz, and > > 5850-5725 MHz in radio access networks. [1] > > > > * 2400 - 2483.5 > > - 100 mW e.i.r.p > > - 10dBm in every 1Mhz > > * 5150 - 5250 > > - 200 mW e.i.r.p > > - 10dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth or -6dBm/25kHz per 25kHz bandwidth > > * 5250 - 5350 > > - 200 mW e.i.r.p > > - 10dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth > > - DFS > > * 5470 - 5725 > > - 1000 mW e.i.r.p > > - 17dBm/MHz per 1MHz bandwidth > > - DFS > > - If TPC is not used, the maximum radiated e.i.r.p. must be reduced > > by 3dB. > > - Outdoor use only > > (Since NO-INDOOR flag is not supported by current format, don't add > > this entry.) > > * 5725 - 5850 > > - 4000 mW e.i.r.p > > - 36dBm in every 500 kHz > > - DFS > > - Outdoor use only > > (Since NO-INDOOR flag is not supported by current format, don't add > > this entry.) > > > > These information is from [4], Mobin Aydinfar shared the official link > > [1] > > (inaccessible from outside of Iran), a mirror version [2] and > > translated > > version [3]. > > > > [1] > > https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 > > [2] https://mobintestserver.ir/Iran-2.4Ghz-5Ghz-cra-official-doc.pdf > > [3] https://mobintestserver.ir/Iran-2.4Ghz-5Ghz-cra-official-table.ods > > [4] > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c9ccf5ba-c091-45c4-9283-970bfa4f1afe@mobintestserver.ir/T/#u > > > > Cc: Mobin Aydinfar <mobin@mobintestserver.ir> > > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > > --- > > db.txt | 9 ++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > index d56ad32d31c9..0189355dff17 100644 > > --- a/db.txt > > +++ b/db.txt > > @@ -934,9 +934,12 @@ country IN: > > (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (24), DFS > > (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (30) > > > > -country IR: DFS-JP > > - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > > - (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) > > +# Source: > > +# > > https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 > > +country IR: DFS-ETSI > > + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) > > + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW) > > + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (200 mW), DFS > > > > # IS as part of CEPT accepted decisions 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 > > 893) > > # and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 > > 440) > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > Thanks for the patch, I should mention the document date is February > 2021, Not 2019. > I did copy and paste from Google translation. I will correct the by v3. Thanks.
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 13:29 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > There are NO-INDOOR and NO-OUTDOOR flags for the database. The kernel > > doesn't have a matching IEEE80211_CHAN_OUTDOOR_ONLY flag though. > > Maybe that should be added? > > > > Johannes, what do you think? > > Good question. I guess we could have it, though I'm not sure we'd have > any mechanics to actually _use_ such a thing right now? Something, say > hostapd (?) would have to promise it's actually outdoors? > > More information doesn't hurt and I don't mind adding it at all, but I > do think we'd probably not be able to use it at this time. > > Or we could add it to the db.txt file but ignore it in parsing now and > skip the band for the binary for now? > > The thing is I don't think we have a good way to say "older kernel skips > this range" - or perhaps we set the NO_IR flag so older kernel cannot > use it but then allow OUTDOOR_ONLY to override that given some > conditions? > Thanks for the suggestion. I have made a patch to allow NO-INDOOR flag, but not parse into binary. Since I'm very not familiar with Python, please review the patch carefully. Thank you.
diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt index d56ad32d31c9..0189355dff17 100644 --- a/db.txt +++ b/db.txt @@ -934,9 +934,12 @@ country IN: (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (24), DFS (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (30) -country IR: DFS-JP - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) - (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) +# Source: +# https://asnad.cra.ir/fa/Public/Documents/Details/73af8590-f065-eb11-968f-0050569b0899 +country IR: DFS-ETSI + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW) + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (200 mW), DFS # IS as part of CEPT accepted decisions 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 893) # and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 440)